Randomized Test Condition Selection for Operator Error Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Human operators in quality assurance testing of electronic devices often miss failures due to automatic response and repeated patterns of behavior, leading to incorrect confirmation of device states during testing.

Innovation Solution

A testing system that randomly selects test conditions for Light Emitting Diodes (LEDs) and Liquid Crystal Displays (LCDs) on Devices Under Test, prompting operators to confirm matching output conditions to reduce the likelihood of automatic responses and ensure accurate testing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If human operators repeatedly test devices using the same testing pattern, then testing efficiency is improved, but operator error increases due to automatic response

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting efficiencyVSAvoidtesting accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The testing system dynamically changes the test conditions by randomly selecting different display outputs (colors, patterns, text) for each test iteration. This prevents operators from falling into automatic response patterns while maintaining efficient testing throughput, directly resolving the contradiction between testing efficiency and accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameters being tested by selecting from multiple different display conditions (various colors, patterns, text strings) rather than using a fixed test pattern. This variation in test parameters keeps operators engaged and accurate while maintaining high testing speed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If operators confirm device states using fixed test patterns, then testing process is simplified, but failure detection accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting process simplicityVSAvoidfailure detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The testing process remains simple for operators to execute (confirm what they see on screen), but the actual test conditions dynamically change with each iteration. This maintains ease of operation while improving failure detection accuracy through varied test stimuli

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements periodic variation in test conditions by randomly selecting different display outputs at regular testing intervals. This periodic change in test parameters improves failure detection while keeping the operator's task consistently simple

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS10036783B1Device testing systems and methods
Publication Date: 2018.07.31 WESTERN DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US10036783B1 patent drawing
  • US10036783B1 patent drawing
  • US10036783B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for testing a Device Under Test (DUT). A test condition is randomly selected from a plurality of test conditions to test the DUT. The DUT is controlled to attempt to output an output condition matching the randomly selected test condition and an operator is prompted to confirm that the output condition matches the randomly selected test condition.