Range Profile Classification Using Hidden Markov Models

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for classifying objects using high-resolution range profiles face challenges in obtaining extensive training data and accurately comparing feature locations and amplitudes, especially when some features are not observed or additional features are present.

Innovation Solution

A method that generates probabilistic models using Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) to represent possible sequences of distances between features, allowing for classification based on the probability of observed sequences in range profiles, which accounts for uncertainty in feature observation and orientation, and includes the generation of primary and secondary probabilistic models from structural details other than direct sensor measurements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If statistical classifiers are used with extensive training measurements from all viewpoints, then classification accuracy is improved, but the complexity and time required to obtain training data increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification accuracyVSAvoidtime to obtain training data
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-defining a set of characteristic features and their expected locations on object templates before actual classification occurs. These features represent physically identifiable structural elements that are likely to produce distinct peaks in range profiles. By preparing these feature locations in advance on templates, the system eliminates the need for extensive training data collection from multiple viewpoints, while still achieving accurate classification through comparison of observed peak locations with pre-defined feature locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Speed

If feature locations are extracted and compared directly with model predictions, then classification speed is improved, but accuracy decreases when some features are not observed or additional features are present

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification speedVSAvoidclassification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by transforming the classification approach from direct feature location matching to a probabilistic framework. Instead of requiring exact matches between observed and predicted feature locations, the system uses probability distributions to represent the likelihood of feature presence and location. This allows the classifier to handle cases where some features are missing or additional features are present, maintaining both speed and accuracy by evaluating the probability of observed features given the model predictions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If extensive training data from all viewpoints is collected, then the classifier can handle all orientations, but the quantity of data required increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandling of all orientationsVSAvoidquantity of training data
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies copying by using object templates that represent the structural features of objects of interest. Instead of collecting extensive training data from multiple viewpoints, the system creates template copies with pre-defined feature locations that represent the expected positions of characteristic features. These templates serve as reference models that can be compared against observed range profiles, enabling the system to handle all orientations without requiring extensive training data for each viewpoint.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentEP2561464B1Classification of range profiles
Publication Date: 2018.12.26 BAE SYSTEMS PLC
  • EP2561464B1 patent drawingFigure 1a~1b
  • EP2561464B1 patent drawingFigure 2a~2c
  • EP2561464B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus are provided for classifying range profiles, generated for example by a radar, lidar or sonar. In the method,each in a set of objects of interest is modelled with a probabilistic model. The probabilistic model represents the probabilities of occurrence of different possible sequences of distances between selected features of the object, in different orientations, that are likely to result in peaks of backscatter in a range profile of the object. The probabilistic model is derived from a first probabilistic representation of each selected feature, generated to represent the uncertainty in locating the feature and the uncertainty in observing the feature in a range profile. Classification is achieved by calculating, for each probabilistic model, the probability that the model would generate a given sequence of distances between observed backscatter events in a given range profile. The model generating the given sequence with the greatest probability identifies the object likely to have produced the given range profile. Preferably, the probabilistic models comprise Hidden Markov Models (HMMs).