Range-Based Restriction Zones for Warehouse Vehicle Speed Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current solutions for vehicles operating in covered environments, such as warehouses, lack the ability to detect and avoid objects effectively while maintaining operational efficiency, particularly in restricted zones where speed adjustments are required.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a materials handling vehicle equipped with sensors and transceivers for detecting location and orientation, coupled with a computing device that determines compliance with zone policies, adjusts vehicle operations, and communicates with remote devices to manage entry and exit from restriction zones.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If static zones are used to require vehicles to reduce speed, then safety in restriction zones is improved, but operational efficiency deteriorates due to unnecessary speed reductions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety complianceVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static speed restriction zones to dynamic, range-based zones that adjust speed requirements in real-time based on actual detected conditions. Vehicles receive customized speed adjustment instructions only when specific objects or hazards are detected within the restriction zone, allowing normal speed operation when zones are clear while maintaining safety when hazards are present.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of speed restriction from a fixed static value to a dynamic variable that depends on detected conditions. The computing device calculates customized speed adjustments based on real-time sensor data, object detection results, and vehicle characteristics, transforming the speed parameter from constant to adaptive.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If static zones require speed reduction, then safety is improved, but the ability to detect and avoid objects deteriorates due to maintained operational speed

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidobject detection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary speed adjustments before vehicles enter restriction zones by calculating required speed changes in advance based on detected objects and hazards. The computing device determines customized speed adjustments that account for vehicle characteristics and object distances, allowing vehicles to approach zones at optimized speeds that balance safety and detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where sensor data from vehicles and environmental sensors are constantly monitored, processed by the computing device, and used to generate real-time speed adjustment instructions. This closed-loop control ensures vehicles receive updated guidance based on changing conditions, improving both safety and object detection effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If one-size-fits-all speed policies are applied, then ease of operation is improved, but adaptability to different vehicle characteristics deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolicy implementation simplicityVSAvoidvehicle-specific compliance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by customizing speed adjustment policies for each individual vehicle based on its specific characteristics such as type, weight, and performance capabilities. Instead of uniform policies, the computing device calculates vehicle-specific speed adjustments that account for each vehicle's unique properties, allowing tailored compliance while maintaining centralized management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary calculations of customized speed adjustments for each vehicle type before operation. The computing device pre-determines appropriate speed modifications based on vehicle characteristics and detected conditions, storing these as lookup tables or pre-computed guidance that simplifies real-time operation while maintaining vehicle-specific adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances the vehicle's ability to navigate restricted zones by dynamically adjusting operations based on detected conditions, improving safety and efficiency by ensuring compliance with predefined policies.

Implementation Method 1

a vehicle transceiver for detecting a location of the materials handling vehicle in the covered environment

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic radiation detection: Radar

Implementation Method 2

a vehicle sensor for detecting an orientation of the materials handling vehicle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInertial measurement: Accelerometer

Data Source

PatentUS20250370465A1Providing range-based zones in a covered environment
Publication Date: 2025.12.04 CROWN EQUIP CORP
  • US20250370465A1 patent drawing
  • US20250370465A1 patent drawing
  • US20250370465A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments provided herein include a method that includes creating a restriction zone policy for a plurality of covered environments that defines a first rule with a restriction range on a hypothetical materials handling vehicle that is located in a restriction zone in at least one of the plurality of covered environments, creating a first restriction zone for a first covered environment that includes defining a first location in the first covered environment of the first restriction zone, and associating the restriction zone policy with the first restriction zone, which includes defining a first value within the restriction range for the first rule. Some embodiments include applying the restriction zone and the restriction zone policy to the location in the first covered environment.