Ranked Vascular Path Selection From Images for Ambiguous Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vascular segmentation methods struggle with low contrast and complex environments, leading to ambiguous results, and require significant human intervention, which is time-consuming and costly.

Innovation Solution

A semi-automatic method that combines manual and automatic techniques to segment vascular paths, using cost functions to rank and present path options, allowing users to select the most likely paths with minimal intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated analysis is used for vascular segmentation, then productivity is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates due to low contrast and complex environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesegmentation speedVSAvoidpath identification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary cost function that bridges automated analysis and manual verification. The cost function processes image data and vascular paths to generate ranked path options, acting as a mediator that transforms complex image data into structured candidates for user selection, thereby maintaining both automation efficiency and precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the vascular path identification process into distinct components: automated vascular path generation, cost function evaluation, and user selection. By dividing the workflow into these segments, the system achieves high productivity through automation while preserving measurement precision through structured user verification of ranked options.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If manual intervention is introduced to ensure quality results, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time increases due to significant human effort required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesegmentation accuracyVSAvoiduser intervention time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary automated analysis to generate multiple candidate vascular paths before user intervention. The cost function pre-evaluates these candidates and ranks them by likelihood, so that when users do intervene, they only need to review pre-processed and organized options rather than analyzing raw data from scratch, significantly reducing user time investment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The cost function automatically evaluates and ranks vascular paths based on image data and anatomical constraints, performing self-service analysis that reduces the burden on users. The system serves itself by generating structured path options with associated confidence scores, requiring minimal user effort to achieve high measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If multiple path options are generated and presented to users, then measurement precision is improved through selection, but device complexity increases due to cost function and ranking system

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepath selection accuracyVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cost function evaluates vascular paths by changing and comparing multiple parameters including image intensity continuity, vascular width consistency, and anatomical constraint satisfaction. By systematically varying and weighting these parameters, the system generates ranked path options that improve measurement precision while managing complexity through parameter-based evaluation rather than complex structural additions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If automated methods are used in complex environments with low contrast, then productivity is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to ambiguous results

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoidsegmentation confidence
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The cost function provides feedback by evaluating each generated vascular path against image data and anatomical constraints, assigning scores that indicate reliability. This feedback mechanism allows the system to maintain high productivity through automated processing while improving reliability by presenting users with confidence-ranked options that reflect the reliability of each segmentation result.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12408885B2Vascular selection from images
Publication Date: 2025.09.09 CATHWORKS LTD
  • US12408885B2 patent drawing
  • US12408885B2 patent drawing
  • US12408885B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for manually assisted definition of vascular features are described. In some embodiments, a method provides for editing of vascular paths by enabling a user to drag an erroneously segmented region of a selected vascular path into alignment with a more correctly segmented position that is depicted as a blood vessel in a vascular image. The method may use an energy function, defined as a function of position along the segmentation of the selected blood vessel, to determine how a vascular path is to be moved based on dragging motions provided by the user. In some instances, non-zero regions of the energy function are set based on the position of the selected region.