Ranolazine IV-to-Oral Transition for Acute Cardiovascular Stabilization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a need for a method to rapidly stabilize patients with acute cardiovascular disease events, particularly those with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome, and to maintain their stability over an extended period using a combination of intravenous and oral ranolazine formulations.

Innovation Solution

The method involves administering an intravenous solution of ranolazine at selected concentrations, titrating the dosage to achieve therapeutic plasma levels, and transitioning to an oral sustained release formulation once the patient is stabilized, with specific dosing regimens and excipient compositions to ensure effective and safe delivery.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If intravenous ranolazine is administered at high concentration to rapidly stabilize patients with acute cardiovascular disease events, then the speed of stabilization is improved, but the risk of adverse effects and toxicity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed of stabilizationVSAvoidadverse effects and toxicity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by titrating the intravenous ranolazine infusion rate and adjusting the concentration based on patient response and serum levels. The infusion starts at a lower rate (e.g., 200 mg/hr) and can be adjusted upward or downward based on clinical effectiveness and tolerance, thereby achieving rapid stabilization while minimizing adverse effects through controlled parameter adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms by monitoring serum ranolazine concentrations and patient response to guide dose adjustments. The dosing regimen is modified based on observed effectiveness and adverse effects, allowing the system to self-regulate and optimize the balance between rapid stabilization and safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If intravenous ranolazine is administered to rapidly treat acute cardiovascular disease events, then the productivity of treatment is improved, but the complexity of dosing regimen increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproductivity of treatmentVSAvoidcomplexity of dosing regimen
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the treatment process into distinct phases: an initial intravenous infusion phase for rapid stabilization, followed by a transition to oral formulation for maintenance therapy. This segmentation allows the complex dosing to be managed in manageable stages, with clear criteria for transitioning from IV to oral administration, thereby improving productivity while controlling complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies dynamics by making the dosing regimen adaptable rather than fixed. The intravenous infusion rate and duration are dynamically adjusted based on patient response, serum levels, and clinical status, allowing the treatment to optimize productivity for each individual patient while managing complexity through flexible rather than rigid protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Duration of action of moving object

If intravenous ranolazine is used to stabilize patients acutely, then the duration of acute stabilization is improved, but the loss of time for transition to oral formulation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveduration of acute stabilizationVSAvoidtime for transition to oral formulation
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by initiating the transition to oral formulation before the intravenous infusion is completely discontinued. The oral medication is started at a lower dose during the IV infusion, and the IV rate is gradually reduced, allowing for a seamless transition that minimizes time loss while maintaining adequate stabilization duration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent ensures continuity of useful action by overlapping the IV and oral administration periods. The oral formulation is introduced during the IV infusion, and the IV rate is progressively reduced rather than abruptly stopped, maintaining continuous therapeutic effect and minimizing the time loss associated with transition while preserving adequate stabilization duration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentEP2216024A3Use of Ranolazine for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases
Publication Date: 2011.08.24 CV THERAPEUTICS INC
  • EP2216024A3 patent drawing
  • EP2216024A3 patent drawing
  • EP2216024A3 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is the treatment of patients suffering from cardiovascular diseases with an intravenous (IV) infusion of ranolazine. In one embodiment, the IV infusion of ranolazine is followed by an orally administered sustained release ranolazine dosage formulation to maintain human ranolazine plasma levels at therapeutic levels in patients.