Random Access Response Beamforming Scheduling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In cellular networks employing narrow beamforming, the network entity faces challenges in determining the best downlink beam for Random-Access Response (RAR) messages due to potential mismatches between downlink and uplink beam directions, leading to inefficient resource allocation and reduced coverage.

Innovation Solution

The system successively transmits multiple RAR messages with adjustable time delay indicators in the Uplink (UL) grants, allowing for flexible scheduling and increased chances of successful reception, even when the best downlink beam is unknown, through mechanisms like many-to-one or many-to-many mappings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Length of stationary object

If narrow beamforming is employed to increase antenna gain and coverage range, then the coverage range is improved, but the angular coverage is reduced making it difficult to determine the best downlink beam for RAR messages

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage rangeVSAvoidbeam direction adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of stationary objectVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The network entity transmits multiple RAR messages in advance with different downlink beam directions before knowing which beam the UE will actually receive. This preliminary transmission of multiple beams allows the UE to select the best received message, resolving the contradiction between narrow beam gain and beam direction uncertainty.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the timing of UL transmissions based on the scheduling-delay indicator included in each RAR message. This dynamic timing adjustment allows flexible scheduling of multiple UL transmissions corresponding to multiple RAR messages, enabling the UE to respond to the best received message while maintaining efficient resource utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If multiple RAR messages are transmitted to ensure successful reception, then the reliability is improved, but the resource allocation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveRAR message reception reliabilityVSAvoidresource allocation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The network entity changes the timing parameter of UL transmissions by adjusting the scheduling-delay indicator in each RAR message. This parameter change allows multiple UL transmissions to be scheduled at different times, reducing resource allocation complexity while maintaining reliability through multiple RAR message transmissions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The random access procedure is segmented into multiple independent RAR message transmissions, each with its own UL grant and scheduling-delay indicator. This segmentation allows the UE to selectively process only the RAR messages it successfully receives, reducing the complexity of resource allocation while improving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Manufacturing precision

If the UE waits for the best downlink beam to transmit RAR messages, then the reception quality is improved, but the access delay increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereception qualityVSAvoidrandom access delay
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The network entity performs preliminary beam sweeping by transmitting multiple RAR messages with different downlink beam directions in advance. This preliminary action eliminates the need for the UE to wait for the best beam, as the best beam is already transmitted among the multiple RAR messages, thus reducing access delay while maintaining reception quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The UE provides feedback by selecting and responding to the RAR message with the best reception quality among multiple received messages. This feedback mechanism allows the UE to indicate which beam direction was most effective, enabling the network to optimize future transmissions without increasing access delay.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20240406963A1Random-access response with analog beamforming
Publication Date: 2024.12.05 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • US20240406963A1 patent drawing
  • US20240406963A1 patent drawing
  • US20240406963A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method of Random-Access Response, RAR, messaging when a base station employs narrow beamforming. Multiple RAR messages are successively transmitted from the base station to a User Equipment, UE, before any response to a RAR message is received from the UE. Thus, despite any calibration mismatch between Uplink, U L, and Downlink, DL, beams in the beamformed system, a RAR message is not only received by the UE, but is received over the most-suitable DL beam for that UE. Each RAR message may contain a message-specific scheduling-delay indicator in the UL grant carried in the RAR message to provide an adjustable time delay for the UE's uplink transmission scheduled by the UL grant. Multiple RAR transmissions can schedule a single UL transmission at a specific time instance or different UL transmissions at different time intervals. The UE may report to the base station the best DL RAR transmission detected by the UE.