Rare Disease Theranostics Platform for Drug Candidate Screening

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for developing new drugs are costly and time-consuming, especially for rare diseases, due to the need for extensive pharmacokinetic and safety data, leading to limited resources for investigating treatments for these diseases.

Innovation Solution

The development of rare disease theranostics platforms that include a cell-phenotype image-enhancing instrument, a drug/nutraceutical library, and a computer-implemented system for analyzing the response of optically-visible rare-disease cell phenotypes to drugs or nutraceuticals, allowing for the identification of candidates that normalize or partially normalize the cell phenotype.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional drug development methods are used for rare diseases, then comprehensive pharmacokinetic and safety data can be obtained, but the process becomes costly and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomprehensive pharmacokinetic and safety dataVSAvoiddrug development time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary phenotypic screening of drug candidates using patient-derived cells before conducting full pharmacokinetic and safety studies. By visualizing and selecting drugs that show beneficial phenotypic effects early in the development process, the system reduces the number of candidates that require extensive downstream testing, thereby reducing overall development time while maintaining data quality for selected candidates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a staged approach where phenotypic screening provides partial evaluation data that is sufficient for initial candidate selection. This partial action (phenotypic screening alone) is used to filter candidates, and only promising candidates proceed to complete pharmacokinetic and safety evaluation, reducing the total workload and time required

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Reliability

If traditional drug development methods are used for rare diseases, then thorough safety evaluation can be conducted, but the cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety evaluation qualityVSAvoiddevelopment cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the drug evaluation process into distinct segments: phenotypic screening using patient-derived cells, followed by pharmacokinetic studies, and then safety evaluation. This segmentation allows the system to identify and advance only those candidates showing beneficial phenotypic effects, reducing the number of drugs that require expensive safety studies while maintaining thorough evaluation for selected candidates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses phenotypic screening as a partial evaluation method that provides sufficient information for candidate selection without requiring complete safety evaluation. This partial action reduces the number of candidates proceeding to costly safety studies, thereby reducing overall development cost while maintaining safety evaluation quality for advanced candidates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If extensive pharmacokinetic and safety data collection is performed, then drug approval can be achieved, but resources for investigating treatments for rare diseases are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrug approval data completenessVSAvoidtreatment investigation throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary phenotypic screening to identify promising drug candidates before committing resources to extensive pharmacokinetic and safety studies. This preliminary filtering increases the likelihood of success for candidates that do proceed through the full data collection process, improving resource efficiency and enabling more treatments to be investigated with limited resources

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the resource-intensive data collection process into stages, with phenotypic screening serving as a low-resource filter. This segmentation ensures that extensive pharmacokinetic and safety data collection is performed only on candidates with demonstrated phenotypic benefit, improving the productivity of treatment investigation by reducing wasted resources on ineffective candidates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Measurement precision

If phenotypic responses are visualized using traditional methods, then cell responses can be observed, but the speed and efficiency of candidate identification is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecell phenotype observation accuracyVSAvoidcandidate identification speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional manual phenotypic observation methods with automated optical imaging and computerized image analysis systems. This substitution maintains measurement precision by using standardized imaging protocols and automated analysis algorithms, while dramatically increasing productivity by enabling high-throughput screening of multiple drug candidates simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables fast, cost-effective identification of drug or nutraceutical candidates for rare diseases by visualizing phenotypic responses and whole-cell effects, reducing the time and number of assays needed, and creating personalized treatment protocols.

Implementation Method 1

a cell-phenotype image-enhancing instrument... detects the response of the optically-visible rare-disease cell-phenotype

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical imaging: Light

Implementation Method 2

magnification optics having sufficient magnifying power to visualize one cell in a plurality of cells

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnification: Lens

Data Source

PatentUS10161929B2Theranostics platform and methods of use
Publication Date: 2018.12.25 SANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INST
  • US10161929B2 patent drawing
  • US10161929B2 patent drawing
  • US10161929B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Theranostics platforms for identifying drugs and nutraceuticals for treatment of rare disease are described. The platforms comprise (a) a cell-phenotype image-enhancing instrument; (b) a drug/nutraceutical library; and (c) a computer-implemented system for analyzing a response of an optically-visible rare-disease cell phenotype to a drug or nutraceutical from the drug/nutraceutical library.