Raster Digitization Model Retraining Using Component-Level Scores

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Workflows utilizing deep learning face challenges in determining when to fine-tune or retrain machine learning models due to data distribution shifts and privacy issues, especially in workflows with multiple models, where identifying which model to retrain is non-trivial.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for automatically generating retraining scores for raster, header, and curve segmentation models within a raster digitization engine, using retraining decision models to independently determine when to retrain these models based on input and output monitoring, considering model dependencies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual monitoring and determination of retraining needs is performed for multiple machine learning models, then model performance can be maintained, but the complexity of system operation and time consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel performanceVSAvoidsystem operation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables machine learning models to self-monitor their own performance metrics and automatically determine when retraining is needed. Each model generates its own retraining scores based on monitoring data, eliminating the need for manual intervention and reducing operational complexity while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements automated feedback loops where performance metrics are continuously monitored, analyzed, and used to generate retraining scores. This feedback mechanism automatically triggers retraining when performance degradation is detected, maintaining model reliability without manual oversight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If frequent retraining of machine learning models is performed to maintain performance, then model accuracy improves, but computational resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accuracyVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts retraining frequency based on actual performance degradation rather than following a fixed schedule. Retraining is performed only when retraining scores indicate genuine performance issues, optimizing the balance between model accuracy and computational resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of retraining timing from static/scheduled to dynamic/condition-based. By monitoring performance metrics and adjusting retraining decisions based on actual model behavior, the system avoids unnecessary retraining computations while maintaining accuracy when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If data is collected and analyzed from multiple sources to determine retraining needs, then retraining decisions become more accurate, but data privacy and residency issues arise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveretraining decision accuracyVSAvoiddata privacy issues
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the retraining decision process by model, with each model monitoring its own performance data independently. This segmentation allows for localized analysis that maintains decision accuracy while reducing the need to aggregate sensitive data across multiple sources, thereby addressing privacy concerns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Loss of time

If automated retraining determination systems are implemented, then time consumption for monitoring is reduced, but the complexity of the system architecture increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonitoring time consumptionVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary setup by establishing monitoring frameworks and performance metric definitions during system initialization. This preliminary action automates the monitoring process, reducing ongoing time consumption while the initial setup complexity is paid off once through automated operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20260065703A1Method to determine when to fine-tune raster digitization components
Publication Date: 2026.03.05 SCHLUMBERGER TECH CORP
  • US20260065703A1 patent drawing
  • US20260065703A1 patent drawing
  • US20260065703A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method determines when to finetune raster digitization components. The method includes generating a raster retraining score for a raster segmentation model of a raster digitization engine. The method further includes generating a header retraining score for a header segmentation model of the raster digitization engine. The method further includes generating a curve retraining score for a curve segmentation model of the raster digitization engine. The method further includes retraining one or more of the raster segmentation model, the header segmentation model, and the curve segmentation model using the raster retraining score, the header retraining score, and the curve retraining score.