Radio Access Technology Preference Indication in Wireless Networks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wireless communication networks, particularly in the 5G context, often prioritize network-centric RAT selection over device-specific preferences, leading to suboptimal energy consumption and operational efficiency, especially when devices have varying capabilities and needs across different Radio Access Technologies (RATs).

Innovation Solution

A mechanism for wireless communication devices to perform signal quality measurements and determine their RAT preferences based on operational attributes, then indicate these preferences to the network, allowing the network to make more informed RAT selection decisions that align with the device's energy efficiency and capabilities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If the network autonomously selects RAT based on network-centric criteria, then network resource allocation is simplified, but device-specific energy consumption optimization is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork control complexityVSAvoiddevice energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The device provides feedback to the network about its RAT preferences based on measured signal qualities and operational attributes. The network uses this feedback to adjust RAT selection decisions, creating a closed-loop system that balances network control with device-specific optimization needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The device performs preliminary measurements of signal quality for multiple RATs and determines its preferences before the network makes the final selection. This preliminary action by the device enables the network to make more informed decisions that account for device-specific energy consumption characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Use of energy by moving object

If the device indicates RAT preferences to the network, then device energy efficiency is improved, but network selection complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice energy consumptionVSAvoidnetwork selection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the parameters provided to the network from simple signal quality measurements to include device-specific operational attributes and preferences. This allows the network to use these enriched parameters for more accurate RAT selection without requiring complex new selection algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If the network considers device RAT preferences, then operational efficiency is improved, but information processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidinformation processing load
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The device extracts and reports only the most relevant operational attributes and preferences to the network, rather than transmitting all possible measurement data. This selective extraction reduces the information processing load on the network while still enabling operational efficiency improvements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS11224010B2Method and apparatus for indicating and using radio access technology preferences in a wireless communication network
Publication Date: 2022.01.11 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • US11224010B2 patent drawing
  • US11224010B2 patent drawing
  • US11224010B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and apparatuses exemplified in this disclosure provide mechanisms for a wireless communication device to indicate its Radio Access Technology (RAT) preferences to a wireless communication network, and for a wireless communication network to consider the RAT preferences of a given device when deciding which RAT the device will use. As a non-limiting example of the advantages flowing from these mechanisms, devices operating within a network that includes or is associated with multiple RATs can indicate their preferences for which RAT they use, while still allowing the network to retain control of the RAT selection decisions. Such flexibility offers significant advantages in 5G networks that provide tight integration between multiple RATS—e.g., between LTE and NR air interfaces. However, the methods and apparatuses disclosed herein are not limited to 5G networks.