Rate Control for UE-to-Network Relay

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In communication networks, particularly in LTE and NR, there is a challenge in enforcing rate limitations for Layer-3 UE-to-network relay and Layer-2 UE-to-network relay scenarios, as existing methods struggle to effectively manage bit rate constraints in sidelink communications, especially when UEs operate autonomously or without network coverage, leading to resource imbalances and insufficient resource allocation for other users.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a first terminal device and a relay terminal device that receive and apply bit rate limitations from a network device, ensuring these limitations are maintained through queue management and resource allocation, with assistance from queue status information and measurement configurations to optimize data rate and resource utilization, thereby enforcing UE-AMBR and UE-PC5-AMBR constraints.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If UEs operate autonomously in sidelink communications without network coverage, then communication flexibility and autonomy are improved, but rate limitation enforcement deteriorates leading to resource imbalances

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautonomous operation capabilityVSAvoidrate limitation enforcement
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-configuring rate limitation parameters (UE-PC5-AMBR, Session-AMBR) in the UE before autonomous sidelink operation. The UE stores these parameters and automatically enforces them without real-time network intervention, resolving the contradiction by preparing rate control mechanisms in advance that remain effective during autonomous operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements self-service by enabling the UE to autonomously enforce rate limitations on its own sidelink transmissions without external network control. The UE independently monitors its data rate, compares it against stored AMBR parameters, and applies rate control locally, allowing autonomous operation while maintaining reliable rate limitation enforcement through self-managed resource management functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of operation

If network devices enforce rate limitations for relayed traffic, then resource allocation fairness is improved, but system complexity increases due to additional control mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation fairnessVSAvoidcontrol mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the rate control function from the network device and relocates it to the UE. By taking out the rate limitation enforcement mechanism from the network side and implementing it locally in the UE, the patent achieves fair resource allocation (as the UE self-regulates) while reducing network device complexity (as they no longer need to implement complex relay traffic control).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary approach where the UE acts as its own rate control mediator. Instead of the network device directly controlling relayed traffic rates, the UE intermediates by autonomously monitoring and enforcing rate limitations on its own transmissions, simplifying the network device's role while maintaining fair resource allocation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If existing rate control methods are applied to Layer-3 UE-to-network relay, then compatibility with existing protocols is maintained, but effectiveness in enforcing session-AMBR and PC5 LINK-AMBR deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotocol compatibilityVSAvoidrate limitation enforcement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by implementing differentiated rate control mechanisms for different relay layers. For Layer-3 relay, it specifically enforces Session-AMBR on Uu interface traffic and PC5 LINK-AMBR on sidelink traffic separately, rather than applying generic rate control. This localized, precise enforcement for each layer maintains protocol compatibility while achieving accurate rate limitation enforcement for each specific interface and traffic type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20240172033A1Method and Apparatus for Rate Control
Publication Date: 2024.05.23 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • US20240172033A1 patent drawing
  • US20240172033A1 patent drawing
  • US20240172033A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the present disclosure provide method and apparatus for rate control. A method performed by a first terminal device comprises receiving at least one bit rate limitation from a network device. The method further comprises applying the at least one bit rate limitation. A relay terminal device is used to relay communication between the first terminal device and a data network.