Rate Control Method for Uplink Data Transmission

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In cellular wireless systems, closed-loop rate control for uplink data transmission in W-CDMA networks experiences errors due to limitations in transmission power and severe fading, leading to synchronization breakdown between the base station and user equipment (UE), resulting in excessive or inadequate transmission power and low data throughput.

Innovation Solution

The method involves periodically resetting the data transmission rates of both the base station and UE to a reference rate and transmitting both absolute and differential rate corrections, with differential corrections being transmitted more frequently, to maintain synchronization and reduce errors in signaling the maximum data transmission rate.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If differential rate correction is transmitted frequently to maintain synchronization, then synchronization accuracy is improved, but transmission overhead and error probability increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesynchronization accuracyVSAvoiderror probability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by having the base station pre-generate and store multiple differential rate correction values before transmission. The UE also pre-calculates expected rate corrections based on channel conditions. This preparation allows both parties to have matching reference values ready, reducing the need for frequent re-transmissions and minimizing error propagation while maintaining synchronization accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If transmission power is increased to improve data rate, then data throughput is improved, but uplink noise management deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata throughputVSAvoiduplink noise
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the base station continuously monitors uplink noise levels and channel conditions, then sends differential rate correction commands to the UE. The UE adjusts its transmission rate based on this feedback, allowing dynamic optimization of throughput while preventing excessive noise generation. The closed-loop control ensures the system adapts to changing conditions without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If rate control commands are transmitted with high reliability to avoid synchronization loss, then synchronization stability is improved, but transmission resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesynchronization stabilityVSAvoidtransmission resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter of rate control signaling from absolute rate commands to differential rate corrections. This parameter transformation reduces the number of bits required for transmission while maintaining synchronization stability. The differential approach exploits the fact that rate changes are typically small and incremental, allowing compact representation that conserves transmission resources without sacrificing reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8014334B2Rate control method and apparatus for data packet transmission
Publication Date: 2011.09.06 NEC CORP
  • US8014334B2 patent drawing
  • US8014334B2 patent drawing
  • US8014334B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Base stations control the transmission rate that is used by UE (user equipment) to forward them information. A UE periodically forwards a rate request to a base station if the UE needs to have its data transmission rate to the base station increased or decreased, and the base station responds with a rate command. An error can occur in the transmission of the rate command, such that a rate Rnb transmitted by the base station and detected by the UE as Rue may not match. Various schemes are proposed for reducing and correcting such transmission errors. A first scheme involves periodically resetting the transmission rate of the base station and UE with a reference rate. Second to fourth schemes involve periodically comparing the transmission rates of the base station and UE, and replacing the rate of the UE if they differ. A fifth scheme involves a filtering of the feedback command in order to reduce the impact of error propagation. A sixth scheme, which may be used separately or in conjunction with any of the foregoing schemes, involves adjusting a power offset with a repetition factor. All of the schemes are modified during a soft handover of the UE from the base station to a new base station.