Rating System for Search Result Ranking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current information searching systems, such as search engines, often return numerous irrelevant results due to keyword manipulation by websites, requiring users to manually sift through results to find relevant information, leading to inefficiency in retrieving accurate data.

Innovation Solution

A rating system that allows users to evaluate and comment on knowledgebase items, with secondary evaluations and commentary, which are used to develop a ranking system that prioritizes relevant results based on community feedback, thereby enhancing the relevance of search results.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If search engines return numerous results based on keyword matching, then the quantity of search results increases, but the relevance and accuracy of results deteriorates due to keyword manipulation by websites

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantity of search resultsVSAvoidrelevance of search results
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where users can rate and comment on search results. This user feedback is then used to adjust the ranking and filtering of future search results, creating a continuous improvement loop that enhances result relevance while maintaining quantity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary rating system that acts as a mediator between search engines and users. This intermediary layer filters and ranks results based on community feedback, separating the quantity provision function from the quality assurance function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If users manually review each search result to determine relevance, then the accuracy of information retrieval improves, but the time required for information retrieval increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of information retrievalVSAvoidtime for information retrieval
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by having users rate and evaluate search results in advance. These pre-evaluations are stored and used to automatically rank future search results, so users don't need to manually review each result for relevance, thus reducing retrieval time while maintaining accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by allowing the community to automatically filter and rank search results through their ratings and comments. This collective self-service mechanism replaces individual manual review, reducing time investment while preserving accuracy through crowd-sourced verification

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS7966319B2Systems and methods for a rating system
Publication Date: 2011.06.21 RED HAT INC
  • US7966319B2 patent drawing
  • US7966319B2 patent drawing
  • US7966319B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An embodiment relates generally to a method of searching. The method includes providing for a knowledgebase item and associating a review for the knowledgebase item. The method also includes associating a rating for the knowledgebase item and developing a ranking associated with the knowledgebase item based on at least one the review and the rating. The method further includes displaying the knowledgebase item based on the ranking in subsequent searches that include the knowledgebase item.