Pre-assembled Raw Material Stack for AR Coating Thickness Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The conventional process for applying anti-reflective (AR) coatings on substrates is prone to operator error, requiring significant skill and resulting in inconsistency and unreliability due to manual handling of raw materials, which can lead to spillage, overfilling, and equipment issues, affecting the quality of the final coating.

Innovation Solution

A pre-assembled raw material stack with multiple layers is used, where energy is sequentially applied to remove each layer for deposition onto a substrate, reducing operator interaction and error, and allowing for precise control of the coating thickness using energy sources like electron beams or sputtering.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual handling of raw materials is used for coating substrates, then operator flexibility is maintained, but operator error and inconsistency increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoating quality consistencyVSAvoidoperator skill requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses automated dispensing mechanisms that self-regulate material flow and deposition parameters, eliminating the need for operator intervention in critical coating processes. The automated system monitors and adjusts parameters automatically, ensuring consistent coating quality without requiring high operator skill levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical handling of raw materials is replaced with automated dispensing systems that use controlled material delivery mechanisms. This substitution eliminates human error in material handling while maintaining precise control over the coating process through automated parameter regulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If manual pouring of raw materials into crucibles is used, then material loading flexibility is maintained, but spillage and overfilling occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial loading accuracyVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The automated dispensing system self-regulates material flow rates and deposition timing, automatically preventing overfilling and spillage. The system monitors material levels and adjusts dispensing parameters in real-time without requiring manual intervention, thereby achieving high manufacturing precision while simplifying the overall process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms that monitor material deposition in real-time and adjust dispensing parameters accordingly. This closed-loop control prevents overfilling and spillage by detecting material levels and automatically adjusting the dispensing rate, ensuring accurate material loading without increasing process complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If sequential access to multiple crucibles is used, then material variety is maintained, but process time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoating deposition speedVSAvoidcrucible management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple crucibles are merged into a single integrated automated dispensing unit that can handle multiple materials simultaneously. The system combines material storage, dispensing, and deposition functions into one coordinated mechanism, eliminating the need for sequential crucible access while maintaining material variety through automated material switching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple materials are pre-loaded into the automated dispensing system before the coating process begins. The system prepares and positions all required materials in advance, allowing rapid switching between materials during deposition without requiring sequential crucible access, thereby increasing productivity while managing device complexity through pre-organization of materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Reliability

If operator skill is required for material management, then process control flexibility is maintained, but operator error and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess reliabilityVSAvoidoperator intervention time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The automated system performs self-monitoring and self-adjustment of coating parameters, eliminating the need for continuous operator intervention. The system automatically detects and corrects deviations from optimal parameters, ensuring high process reliability while minimizing the time operators need to spend on material management and process control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Real-time feedback mechanisms continuously monitor coating parameters and material deposition rates, automatically adjusting process conditions to maintain optimal performance. This closed-loop control system eliminates the need for skilled operator judgment and intervention, reducing both operator error and time consumption while maintaining high process reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method significantly reduces operator error and process steps, ensuring consistent and reliable application of AR coatings with improved product quality by automating the layer deposition process.

Implementation Method 1

Evaporating includes an energetic electron beam used to heat one of the raw materials in a pocket to a sufficient temperature such that at least a portion of the raw material is evaporated

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectron beam heating and evaporation: Electron Beam

Implementation Method 2

the evaporated material is then deposited onto the surface of the lens substrate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporation: Evaporation

Implementation Method 3

delivering energy to the assembly, in which the delivering of energy includes removing at least a portion of the assembly. With removal, said portion of the assembly is deposited onto a substrate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhysical vapor deposition: Physical Vapour Deposition

Data Source

PatentUS10544501B2Multi-layer assembly and method for controlling layer thicknesses
Publication Date: 2020.01.28 ESSILOR INTERNATIONAL(COMPAGNIE GENERALE D OPTIQUE)
  • US10544501B2 patent drawing
  • US10544501B2 patent drawing
  • US10544501B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A pre-fabricated assemblies and methods of use for coating substrates are described. The pre-fabricated assembly includes at least two layers in a stack, each layer includes at least one raw material. The raw material in each layer may be a dielectric material. One type of stack has one outer layer as an exposed layer. One type of stack has an exposed portion with each layer, and a portion of all layers is exposed. In use, a stack in a pre-fabricated assembly is positioned in a vacuum chamber system and energy is delivered sequentially to the exposed layer, removing at least a portion of each exposed layer. Each layer becomes an exposed layer and is deposited on the substrate in a sequential manner. The pre-assembled raw material stack is used to fabricate a multi-layered coating, such as a multi-layered coating for an optical or ophthalmic article.