Razor Blade Aperture Offset for Complete Shaving Coverage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Razors with apertures on a broad surface blade often miss hairs due to small gaps between effective shaving zones, leading to incomplete shaving as the bell curve distribution of cutting effectiveness does not fully overlap, resulting in missed hairs.

Innovation Solution

The razor features a metallic foil sheet with apertures arranged in an offset array or angled orientation relative to the handle, or utilizes a powered circular scrubbing motion to eliminate or minimize gaps between effective shaving zones, ensuring overlapping cutting edges and reducing missed hairs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If apertures are arranged in a regular array on the blade, then manufacturing is simplified and blade structure is regular, but gaps between effective shaving zones cause hairs to be missed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblade manufacturing simplicityVSAvoidshaving completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by offsetting the arrangement of apertures in adjacent rows, creating an asymmetric pattern rather than a regular grid. This offset arrangement causes the effective shaving zones to overlap, eliminating gaps and ensuring complete hair coverage while maintaining manufacturing feasibility through a systematic offset pattern.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a dimensional change by arranging apertures in an offset pattern across multiple rows, effectively utilizing the two-dimensional blade surface more efficiently. The offset arrangement in the lateral dimension ensures that effective shaving zones overlap, converting a one-dimensional gap problem into a solved two-dimensional coverage pattern.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Area of stationary object

If apertures are closely spaced to cover more area, then shaving coverage increases, but gaps between effective zones still result in missed hairs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshaving coverage areaVSAvoidhair cutting completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

By implementing an offset array where apertures in adjacent rows are laterally displaced, the effective shaving zones overlap to eliminate gaps. This asymmetric arrangement ensures complete hair coverage across the entire blade area without requiring increased aperture density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Ease of operation

If traditional linear blade movement is used, then操作简单ity is maintained, but gaps in effective shaving zones cause incomplete shaving

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshaving operation simplicityVSAvoidshave quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The offset aperture arrangement creates an asymmetric pattern that eliminates gaps in effective shaving zones. This allows the blade to maintain simple linear movement during operation while achieving complete hair coverage through the geometric arrangement of apertures rather than complex motion patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Data Source

PatentEP1899118B1Method of optimizing the shaving performance of a razor
Publication Date: 2009.12.16 THE GILLETTE CO
  • EP1899118B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP1899118B1 patent drawingFigure 2~2A
  • EP1899118B1 patent drawingFigure 3~3A

AI summary

Razor blades (20) and razors are provided. The razor blades include apertures (12) , the perimeter of each aperture forming a cutting edge. The razor blades and razors are constructed so as to minimize gaps between the effective shaving zones (14) of the apertures.