RC Receiver Parameter Sync for Multi-Transmitter Configuration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing method of configuring RC model vehicle parameters in transmitters requires unintuitive and time-consuming actions when switching or upgrading, duplicating efforts, and is inefficient for operators.

Innovation Solution

A system where RC model vehicle parameters are stored in the receiver's BLOB, allowing automatic synchronization with a transmitter by comparing and updating BLOB versions when the vehicle is motionless, ensuring compatibility and efficient configuration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If parameters are stored in the transmitter, then the transmitter can control the vehicle, but the operator must manually reconfigure parameters when switching transmitters, increasing setup time and complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of configurationVSAvoidsetup time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the traditional parameter storage location from the transmitter to the receiver. Instead of the transmitter holding all parameter profiles, the receiver now stores the authoritative parameter data and transmits it to the transmitter during binding. This inversion eliminates the need for manual reconfiguration when switching transmitters, as the receiver automatically provides its parameters to any compatible transmitter.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a copying mechanism where the receiver's parameter profile is automatically copied to the transmitter during the binding process. The transmitter creates a local copy of the receiver's parameters for operational use, while the receiver remains the source of truth. This copying approach enables seamless transmitter switching without requiring operators to manually re-enter parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Adaptability or versatility

If parameters are stored in the transmitter, then the transmitter has full control, but switching or upgrading transmitters requires duplicating configuration efforts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmitter compatibilityVSAvoidconfiguration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent fundamentally inverts the parameter management architecture by making the receiver the primary storage location rather than the transmitter. This inversion simplifies the system because the receiver becomes the single source of truth that automatically manages parameter distribution to multiple transmitters, eliminating the complexity of manual configuration duplication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal parameter management system where the receiver serves multiple functions: storing parameters, validating transmitters, and automatically distributing parameters to any compatible transmitter. This multi-functional approach to the receiver enhances transmitter compatibility while reducing overall system complexity, as the receiver handles all parameter management tasks centrally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If parameters are stored in the receiver, then automatic synchronization is possible, but requires version comparison and update mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter consistencyVSAvoidsynchronization mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism through version number comparison. The receiver includes a version number with its parameter profile, and the transmitter compares this version against its local copy. When the receiver detects a version mismatch, it automatically initiates an update by transmitting its current parameters to the transmitter. This feedback loop ensures parameter consistency while automating the synchronization process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates preliminary action by including version numbers with parameter profiles before transmission. This allows the transmitter to pre-assess whether an update is needed before initiating the synchronization process, avoiding unnecessary data transfers and optimizing the update mechanism's efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20260021422A1Model vehicle receiver centric parameter system
Publication Date: 2026.01.22 TRAXXAS
  • US20260021422A1 patent drawing
  • US20260021422A1 patent drawing
  • US20260021422A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A radio-controlled (RC) model vehicle system is provided including a transmitter and an RC model vehicle containing a receiver. The transmitter includes a transmitter binary large object (BLOB) parameter profile and a transmitter BLOB Version. The receiver is wirelessly, communicably coupled with the transmitter and includes a receiver BLOB parameter profile comprising RC model vehicle parameters corresponding to the RC model vehicle, and a receiver BLOB Version. Changes to the transmitter BLOB are saved to the transmitter and increment the transmitter BLOB Version by one. The transmitter is linked and bound to the receiver, and the receiver BLOB Version is compared to the transmitter BLOB Version. When the RC model vehicle is motionless and the receiver BLOB Version is less than the transmitter BLOB Version, the receiver BLOB is updated with the transmitter BLOB and the receiver BLOB Version is updated to the transmitter BLOB Version.