Reaction Detection System With Privacy Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In group interactions, such as meetings or conferences, participants often lack feedback on the reactions and emotions of others, especially in large or remote settings, which impairs natural conversation and communication effectiveness.

Innovation Solution

A system that uses sensors to detect physical and physiological reactions of participants, providing feedback to adjust the environment and improve communication, while ensuring participant consent and control over their data privacy and usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If sensors are deployed to detect participant reactions in real-time, then communication effectiveness is improved, but device complexity and privacy concerns increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication effectivenessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex task of reaction detection into multiple independent sensor types (facial expression cameras, physiological sensors, voice analysis microphones) that can be independently deployed and managed. Each sensor type focuses on a specific aspect of participant reaction, making the overall system more manageable and less complex while still achieving comprehensive monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary processing layer that acts as a mediator between the various sensors and the feedback delivery mechanism. This intermediary layer aggregates data from multiple sensor sources, processes the information through algorithms, and transforms it into meaningful feedback signals, thereby reducing the complexity of direct sensor-to-feedback connections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If detailed reaction data is collected from participants, then feedback accuracy is improved, but loss of information privacy increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction detection accuracyVSAvoidprivacy loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by allowing participants to selectively control which aspects of their reactions are monitored and shared. Different participants can have different privacy settings applied to different sensor types or different levels of data aggregation, enabling precise control over their own information exposure while maintaining accurate feedback for those who consent to higher levels of monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary action by obtaining participant consent and configuring privacy preferences before reaction data collection begins. The system establishes privacy boundaries and detection parameters in advance, allowing participants to make informed decisions about their data sharing preferences prior to the interaction, thereby preventing privacy loss while maintaining measurement accuracy for approved data types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If real-time feedback is provided to participants, then engagement is improved, but loss of time for processing and delivering feedback increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticipant engagementVSAvoidfeedback processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs periodic action by delivering feedback at strategically chosen intervals rather than continuously. The feedback mechanism periodically aggregates sensor data, processes it through analysis algorithms, and delivers consolidated feedback signals to participants at moments when they are most likely to be receptive, thereby maintaining engagement while reducing the time spent on constant processing and delivery operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by selectively providing feedback to only those participants whose reactions warrant attention or who have specific preferences for feedback delivery. Rather than processing and delivering feedback to all participants continuously, the system identifies and focuses on relevant feedback opportunities, reducing overall processing time while maintaining high engagement for the targeted participants.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS8670018B2Detecting reactions and providing feedback to an interaction
Publication Date: 2014.03.11 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US8670018B2 patent drawing
  • US8670018B2 patent drawing
  • US8670018B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Reaction information of participants to an interaction may be sensed and analyzed to determine one or more reactions or dispositions of the participants. Feedback may be provided based on the determined reactions. The participants may be given an opportunity to opt in to having their reaction information collected, and may be provided complete control over how their reaction information is shared or used.