Load Reaction Jig for High-Torque Fastener Installation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The installation of high-torque nut and bolt fasteners using hand-held power tools poses a risk of tool counter-rotation, potentially injuring the operator or damaging the tool and structure, and existing solutions like reaction arms are cumbersome and unsuitable for restricted access applications.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a load reaction jig that secures a power tool to a fastener, allowing the counter-rotation force to be reacted into the jig and then into another fastener, eliminating the need for a bulky reaction arm and enabling secure tightening of multiple fasteners without moving the jig.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a reaction arm is used to prevent tool counter-rotation during high-torque fastener installation, then tool stability is improved, but device complexity and weight increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetool stabilityVSAvoidtooling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reaction arm is divided into separate components: a stationary reaction structure attached to the workpiece, and a movable coupling device that connects the power tool to the reaction structure. This segmentation eliminates the need for a single bulky reaction arm while achieving the same counter-rotation prevention function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The reaction structure serves as an intermediary element between the power tool and the workpiece. Instead of directly reacting forces through a large reaction arm, the intermediary reaction structure with positioning stops provides a stable reference point that prevents tool counter-rotation while reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If a reaction arm is used to prevent tool counter-rotation, then tool stability is improved, but the size of the tooling increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetool stabilityVSAvoidreaction arm size
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of attaching a large reaction arm to the power tool to prevent counter-rotation, the solution inverts the approach by attaching a compact reaction structure to the workpiece and coupling the tool to this stationary structure. This inversion reduces the moving volume while maintaining stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The reaction structure utilizes the workpiece itself as the reaction surface, distributing the counter-rotation prevention function across the workpiece structure rather than concentrating it in a large reaction arm. This dimensional distribution reduces the volume of moving components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If a reaction arm is used to prevent tool counter-rotation, then tool stability is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetool stabilityVSAvoidinstallation ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The reaction structure is pre-positioned on the workpiece with positioning stops that align with specific features of the workpiece. This preliminary positioning eliminates the need for complex alignment procedures when installing the power tool, improving ease of operation while maintaining stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Reliability

If a reaction arm is used to prevent tool counter-rotation, then tool stability is improved, but adaptability to restricted access applications deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetool stabilityVSAvoidrestricted access adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the reaction system into a stationary reaction structure and a movable coupling device, the system can be configured for restricted access applications. The coupling device can be positioned in tight spaces while the reaction structure remains on the accessible workpiece surface, enabling operation in previously inaccessible areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP4000808B1Method of installing fasteners and apparatus relating thereto
Publication Date: 2024.04.03 AIRBUS OPERATIONS LTD
  • EP4000808B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4000808B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP4000808B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

A method of installing a plurality of nut and bolt fasteners (300) upon a structure (100, 200) is described. The method comprises placing a jig (400) around the nut (301) of a first fastener (300) and the nut (301) of a second fastener (300), securing the jig (400) to the first fastener (300), and then using a power tool (600) to tighten the nut of the second fastener (300) to a target torque. The step of tightening the nut comprises engaging a socket portion (709) of the power tool (600) with the nut, securing the power tool (600) to the jig (400) such that a handle portion of the power tool (600) is prevented from rotating about an axis of rotation of a socket portion (709) of the power tool (600) when the nut is being rotated by the socket portion (700). This application also describes a jig (400), jig fasteners (500) for securing a jig (400) to a fastener (300), and a fastening head (700) for a power tool (600).