Actuated Reaction Mass Isolation for Robotic Vibration Errors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Robotic systems face imprecision and poor processing results due to vibrations and disturbances, necessitating improved vibration isolation systems to reduce movement errors in applications like laser processing and tool manipulation.

Innovation Solution

The use of actuable reaction masses coupled with actuators to move the reaction mass in a corrective direction, reducing movement errors by applying reaction forces and rotational reaction torques, with detection systems and controllers to manage these movements effectively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If robotic systems operate without vibration isolation, then device complexity is reduced, but manufacturing precision and measurement precision deteriorate due to vibrations and disturbances

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The vibration isolation system is divided into separate functional modules: reaction masses, actuators, sensors, and controllers. Each component operates independently but coordinates through control signals, allowing the system to address vibrations without requiring complete system redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Reaction masses serve as intermediary elements between the robotic system and vibrations. These masses, when actuated, generate counter-forces that cancel vibrations without directly modifying the robotic structure or payload, thus maintaining simplicity while improving precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If actuators move reaction masses to counteract vibrations, then movement precision improves, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveposition accuracyVSAvoidactuator energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The actuator operates periodically rather than continuously, activating only when vibration counteraction is needed. The controller monitors system vibrations and triggers actuator operation selectively, reducing overall energy consumption while maintaining position accuracy during critical operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts actuator parameters such as force magnitude and frequency based on real-time vibration conditions. By matching actuator output to actual vibration levels, the system minimizes energy consumption while effectively counteracting disturbances that affect position accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If reaction masses are added to the system, then vibration isolation effectiveness improves, but system weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevibration isolation effectivenessVSAvoidsystem weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The reaction masses are integrated into the robotic system's dynamic model and controlled through dynamic compensation. Rather than being static added weight, these masses are actively manipulated to generate counter-forces, maximizing vibration isolation effectiveness relative to their weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The reaction masses function as dynamic counterweights that generate forces opposing vibrations. By positioning and actuating these masses strategically, the system achieves effective vibration cancellation with minimal additional mass, as the counteracting force depends on mass acceleration rather than mass alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

4Manufacturing precision

If multiple sensors and actuators are integrated for comprehensive vibration control, then vibration isolation performance improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system architecture is designed to be universal, with the same controller and actuator types handling multiple vibration isolation tasks across different robotic operations. This multi-functionality approach allows comprehensive vibration control without proportionally increasing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Sensors continuously monitor vibrations and feed this information back to the controller, which adjusts actuator commands in real-time. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables effective vibration isolation with a coordinated system of sensors and actuators, managing complexity through systematic control rather than isolated components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively isolates payloads from vibrations and disturbances, enhancing precision and stability in robotic systems by actively counteracting movement errors and resonances.

Implementation Method 1

The actuator is configured to move the reaction mass in response to a movement error of the payload to reduce the movement error of the payload

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReaction force: Reaction (physics)

Implementation Method 2

the actuator is a linear actuator configured to translate the reaction mass along a linear direction corresponding to the corrective direction of the movement error to produce a reaction force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLinear motion:

Implementation Method 3

the actuator comprises a rotary actuator configured to rotate the reaction mass about an axis of rotation to produce a rotational reaction torque along the corrective direction of the movement error

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRotational motion:

Implementation Method 4

Vibration isolation system (VIS) modules, apparatus, and methods are disclosed that use actuatable reaction masses to reduce or eliminate vibrational movement errors of payloads

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration isolation: Vibration

Data Source

PatentUS12055193B2Vibration isolation systems with reaction masses and actuators
Publication Date: 2024.08.06 NIKON CORP
  • US12055193B2 patent drawing
  • US12055193B2 patent drawing
  • US12055193B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatus include a reaction mass and an actuator coupled to the reaction mass. The actuator is configured to couple to a payload and to move the reaction mass in response to a movement error of the payload to reduce the movement error of the payload. Robotic systems using actuated reaction masses, as well as related methods of reducing movement errors, are also disclosed.