Multifunction Reaction Washer Axial Torque Transfer

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing reaction washers face challenges such as slipping due to insufficient initial bite force, risk of snapping off during peak torque, debris accumulation, and inadvertent assembly issues, which affect their ability to securely tighten and loosen nuts and bolts, especially on coated or corroded surfaces.

Innovation Solution

The design features axially one-sided tool access castles, a central initial bushing face for low friction, and peaked forms on the bottom for biting, along with a torsion lift interface with helical ramps to ramp up axial contact force and reduce thread friction, ensuring secure engagement and preventing slipping.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the reaction washer top is made smooth and hard to minimize friction during initial tightening, then the friction on the reaction washer top is reduced, but the risk of the nut or bolt head becoming inadvertently loose increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefriction on reaction washer topVSAvoidsecurity of nut or bolt head
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The reaction washer is designed with different surface qualities at different locations: the top surface is smooth and hard to minimize friction during initial tightening, while the bottom surface features serrations to maximize bite and prevent slipping. This local differentiation of surface properties resolves the contradiction between ease of operation and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If the reaction washer bottom serrations are designed to bite into the resting surface, then slipping is prevented and torque transfer is effective, but a large contact force is required during initial tightening

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetorque transfer effectivenessVSAvoidcontact force during initial tightening
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The serrations on the reaction washer bottom are designed with specific geometric parameters (depth, angle, spacing) that allow them to engage effectively with the resting surface at lower contact forces. This optimization of geometric parameters resolves the contradiction between reliable torque transfer and reduced initial tightening force requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Power

If a circumferential spline is used for radial torque transfer, then torque transfer is achieved, but substantial radial forces are produced requiring a larger reaction socket outer diameter

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetorque transfer capabilityVSAvoidreaction socket outer diameter
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using a conventional circumferential spline that transfers torque radially and produces substantial radial forces, the invention inverts the approach by using axial splines that transfer torque axially. This inversion eliminates the need for a large reaction socket outer diameter while maintaining effective torque transfer capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

4Ease of manufacture

If a shallow reaction washer spline is used, then manufacturing is simplified, but the reaction socket may snap off during peak torque transfer

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespline depthVSAvoidresistance to snapping off
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention inverts the conventional shallow circumferential spline by using deeper axial splines. This inversion allows the splines to be accessed from both axial sides, providing dual access for tool engagement and significantly increasing resistance to snapping off during peak torque transfer, while maintaining manufacturing feasibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

5Strength

If the reaction socket bottom outer diameter is increased to withstand radial forces, then structural integrity is improved, but the clearance required around the nut and bolt head increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveradial force withstand capabilityVSAvoidclearance around nut and bolt head
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

By inverting from radial torque transfer with circumferential splines to axial torque transfer with axial splines, the invention eliminates the need for a large reaction socket bottom outer diameter. This inversion maintains structural integrity and radial force withstand capability while minimizing the clearance required around the nut and bolt head.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

6Ease of operation

If debris and paint accumulate around the reaction washer bottom, then accessibility of the circumferential spline is reduced, but the accumulation is inevitable in real world applications

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespline accessibilityVSAvoiddebris and paint accumulation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention inverts from circumferential splines that are susceptible to debris accumulation and accessibility issues to axial splines that can be accessed from both axial sides. This inversion makes the spline interface insensitive to debris and paint accumulation, as tools can approach from the axial direction rather than having to navigate around accumulated contaminants.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration prevents slipping, secures the nut or bolt head, and allows for non-destructive loosening, while the axially reacting washer stack ensures reliable torque transfer and assembly accuracy, even on challenging surfaces.

Implementation Method 1

The design features axially one-sided tool access castles, a central initial bushing face for low friction, and peaked forms on the bottom for biting, along with a torsion lift interface with helical ramps to ramp up axial contact force and reduce thread friction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHelical ramp mechanism: Screw

Implementation Method 2

peaked forms on the bottom for biting

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForce concentration: Pressure Increase

Implementation Method 3

a central initial bushing face for low friction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction reduction: Lubrication

Data Source

PatentUS10107325B2Multifunction reaction washer and stack accessed by slim reaction socket
Publication Date: 2018.10.23 PRIMESOURCE CONSULTING LLC
  • US10107325B2 patent drawing
  • US10107325B2 patent drawing
  • US10107325B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Accurate reaction socket access within an outer washer diameter is provided via a number of tool access castles extending from a stepped bushing and serration top, which in turn provides low friction during initial tightening and securing after final loading of a nut/bolt. Bottom serration slipping during initial tightening and thread locking during initial loosening are eliminated by the reaction washer stacked on top and in contact with a support washer via helical ramps and ramp mates. During initial tightening or loosening, the ramp mates slide up or down the helical ramps whereby an axial load on the nut/bolt is ramped up or down prior to screwing it on the main thread. A clamp ring or ramp indenters may secure the two washers. An interposition washer may extend the axial reaction range of the washer stack. Direct tension indicators may be combined with the ramp indenters.