Reactive Brazing Alloy Composition for Alumina-Metal Sealing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Reactive brazing methods face challenges in achieving strong, reliable bonds between alumina ceramics and metals, particularly in vacuum interrupters, due to poor wettability and mechanical strength issues when the composition of the braze is poorly adapted to the metal, leading to visual defects and reduced mechanical strength.

Innovation Solution

A method using a brazing alloy with a specific composition of AgCuTi, where the titanium content is adjusted to form a thick and stable reaction layer on the alumina surface, minimizing non-wetting areas and maintaining intermetallic compounds below a certain value to enhance mechanical strength, without the need for preliminary metallization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If reactive brazing alloys are used to improve wettability of alumina, then wettability is improved, but mechanical strength decreases and sealing defects occur

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovewettabilityVSAvoidmechanical strength
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the chemical composition parameters of the brazing alloy, specifically limiting reactive elements (Ti, V, Zr, Nb) to 0.1-5 wt% and intermetallic formers (Al, Fe, Ni, Cu) to 45-95 wt%, to achieve optimal balance between wettability and mechanical strength without excessive chemical activity that causes defects

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The brazing alloy is designed as a composite system combining multiple elements with complementary functions: reactive elements for wettability enhancement, intermetallic formers for strength, and base metals for ductility, creating a balanced material that avoids the extremes of purely reactive or non-reactive alloys

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If metallization of alumina surface is performed to achieve strong bonds, then mechanical strength is improved, but process complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical strengthVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention merges the brazing alloy composition design with the metallization function, incorporating reactive elements directly into the brazing alloy that can chemically bond to alumina surface during the brazing process itself, eliminating the need for separate metallization steps while achieving comparable or superior bond strength

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention extracts the metallization function from the separate preprocessing step and integrates it into the brazing alloy composition, allowing the alloy itself to provide the chemical bonding capability previously requiring separate surface treatment operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Strength

If high chemical activity of reactive element with metal is used to improve bonding, then bonding is enhanced, but non-wetting areas and sealing defects increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebonding strengthVSAvoidsealing quality
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention precisely controls the concentration parameter of reactive elements within 0.1-5 wt% range, which is sufficient to enhance bonding through controlled chemical activity while remaining below the threshold that causes excessive reactivity, non-wetting areas, and sealing defects

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables good wettability and mechanical strength in assemblies where reactive brazing was previously inadequate, allowing for reliable bonding and improved sealing without the complexity and cost of metallization, as demonstrated by the thickness of the reaction layer and probability of rupture graphs.

Implementation Method 1

The quality of the wetting is characterized by the wetting angle θ. If θ < 55°, the wetting is good and an intimate bond at the atomic scale will succeed in forming at any point of the interface.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWetting: Wetting

Implementation Method 2

The reactive alloys developed to achieve brazing between oxide ceramics such as alumina and metals are mainly based on AgCu and most often contain titanium as a reactive element

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical reaction: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 3

The brazing technique consists in a manner known per se in assembling two materials using a metal or a so-called 'filler' alloy whose melting point is lower than that of the materials to be assembled.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMelting and solidification: Melting

Data Source

PatentEP2263820B1Brazing method using a reactive brazing alloy and vacuum-tight vessels obtained
Publication Date: 2017.07.26 SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC IND SAS
  • EP2263820B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2263820B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2263820B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A reactive brazing of primary metallic element with secondary element containing ion-covalent oxide is performed using alloy designed to constitute liquid brazing alloy designed to wet two metallic and ion-covalent oxide surfaces of two elements. The content of titanium in brazing alloy is 2-5 wt.%, when the content of metal which can form intermetallic compounds with titanium is less than 20 wt.%. The content of titanium is 5-10 wt.%, when the content of metal which can form intermetallic compounds with titanium metal is 20-50 wt.%. Thus, assembly method is enabled. A reactive brazing of primary metallic element with secondary element containing an ion-covalent oxide on the surface is performed using alloy designed to constitute liquid brazing alloy designed to wet the two metallic and ion-covalent oxide surfaces of the two elements. The brazing alloy contains titanium and metallic element contains nickel. The content of titanium in the brazing alloy is 2-5 wt.%, when the content of the metal which can form intermetallic compounds with titanium is less than 20 wt.%. The content of titanium is 5-10 wt.%, when the content of the metal which can form intermetallic compounds with titanium metal is 20-50 wt.%. The content of titanium is 2-5 wt.%, when the content of metal which can form intermetallic compounds with titanium is more than 50 wt.%. The content of silver is less than 60 wt.%, such that the non-wettability area on the surface of the secondary element obtained from ion-covalent oxide with thickness and stable reaction layer at the interface of the element is minimized, and the formation of intermetallic compounds in the brazed joint is minimized. Thus, assembly method is enabled. An independent claim is included for vacuum cartridge, which has cylindrical component and two end cover plates, in which at least one is assembled to the cartridge component.