Multi-layered Reactive Thin Film Solid Propellants

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

High-energy solid propellants face inefficiencies due to incomplete burning of metal fuels, physical obstructions, and energy losses from molten metal pooling and supercooling, leading to unstable burn rates and reduced specific impulse in rocket motors.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating multi-layered reactive thin films with chemically bonded metal and inorganic oxidizer layers into the propellant matrix, which self-oxidize and release energy quickly, reducing residence time and enhancing heat transfer, thereby stabilizing burn rates and increasing energy density.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If metal fuels are used in high-energy solid propellants, then energy density is improved, but burn completeness deteriorates due to incomplete burning and molten metal pooling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy densityVSAvoidburn completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The metal fuel is segmented into thin film layers (e.g., aluminum layers of specific thickness ranges) rather than using bulk metal particles. This segmentation prevents molten metal pooling and ensures more complete combustion by increasing surface area to volume ratio, thereby resolving the contradiction between energy density and burn completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses composite thin film structures combining metal layers with binder materials and oxidizer layers. This composite approach allows the metal fuel to maintain structural integrity while achieving complete combustion, simultaneously improving energy density utilization and burn reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Stability of the object's composition

If multi-layered reactive thin films are used, then burn rate stability is improved, but device complexity increases due to layered structure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveburn rate stabilityVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The propellant is segmented into multiple thin functional layers (metal layers, oxidizer layers, binder layers) each with specific thicknesses and compositions. This segmentation enables precise control over burn rate characteristics while maintaining manufacturing feasibility through established thin film deposition techniques.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention controls burn rate stability by adjusting parameters such as layer thickness, material composition, and layer sequence in the thin film structure. By optimizing these parameters, the patent achieves stable burn rates without requiring overly complex manufacturing processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Use of energy by moving object

If metal fuel particles are used, then specific impulse is reduced due to momentum losses, but energy content is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy contentVSAvoidmomentum losses
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the physical form of metal fuel from particles to thin films, fundamentally altering combustion characteristics. This parameter change reduces momentum losses by preventing molten metal ejection while maintaining high energy content, thereby improving specific impulse.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention converts the potential harm of molten metal pooling and ejection into a benefit by using thin film structures that naturally prevent pooling. The same properties that would cause momentum losses in particle form (metal liquidity during combustion) are transformed into advantages through the thin film geometry, ensuring complete combustion without ejection losses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The use of reactive thin films in solid composite propellants improves burn consistency, reduces momentum losses, and increases specific impulse, leading to more efficient energy extraction and enhanced rocket motor performance.

Implementation Method 1

multi-layered reactive thin films with chemically bonded metal and inorganic oxidizer layers into the propellant matrix, which self-oxidize and release energy quickly

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSelf-oxidation: Oxidation

Implementation Method 2

reducing residence time and enhancing heat transfer, thereby stabilizing burn rates

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Conduction (thermal)

Data Source

PatentUS8444785B2Solid composite propellants and methods of making propellants
Publication Date: 2013.05.21 LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP
  • US8444785B2 patent drawing
  • US8444785B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Solid composite propellants are provided that include a matrix comprising an energetic oxidizer and a binder. A multi-layered reactive thin film is provided in the matrix. The reactive thin film includes metal and inorganic oxidizer. Methods of making the solid composite propellants are also provided.