Aerobic Reactor Cascade and Lateral Collectors for Oxygen Capture

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing aerobic fluid treatment reactors face limitations in capturing atmospheric oxygen, leading to reduced treatment capacity and the occurrence of fermentation processes, especially when handling effluents with high fat and organic matter content, such as those from animal farms.

Innovation Solution

The reactor design divides the fluid into two fractions, with one fraction forming a cascade to capture new air bubbles and the other undergoing mechanical surface agitation in lateral collectors to degasify existing gases, increasing the solubilization of oxygen through turbulence and reducing dissolved gas concentrations, thereby enhancing oxygen capture and purification efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If a single central collector is used for fluid treatment, then the structure is simple, but the capture rate of atmospheric oxygen is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecapture rate of atmospheric oxygenVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reactor is divided into multiple functional zones: a central collector for oxygen capture and multiple lateral collectors for fluid distribution and degasification. This segmentation allows simultaneous oxygen absorption in the central zone and CO2 removal in lateral zones, resolving the contradiction by increasing oxygen capture capacity while maintaining manageable structural complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Quantity of substance

If fluid flows directly to the bottom without surface agitation, then the process is simple, but the solubilization capacity for new air is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesolubilization capacity for oxygenVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The lateral collectors perform preliminary surface agitation and degasification of the fluid before it reaches the bottom of the tank. This preliminary removal of dissolved gases (especially CO2) increases the fluid's capacity to absorb new oxygen when it reaches the central collector, resolving the contradiction by enhancing oxygen solubilization while keeping the process relatively simple through passive flow guidance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If atmospheric oxygen capture is limited, then the treatment capacity is reduced, but fermentation processes occur giving rise to bad odours

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment capacityVSAvoidfermentation processes and bad odours
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The reactor converts the potentially harmful accumulation of CO2 from aerobic digestion into a beneficial process by using lateral collectors to actively remove CO2 and other dissolved gases from the fluid. This prevents anaerobic fermentation conditions while the central collector simultaneously maximizes oxygen absorption, thereby increasing treatment capacity and eliminating bad odours through the conversion of a harmful byproduct into a controlled degasification process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design significantly improves the capture rate of atmospheric oxygen, increasing the reactor's treatment capacity and achieving higher purification yields in complex fluids with high organic content by removing enriched carbon dioxide and increasing oxygen solubilization in the fluid.

Implementation Method 1

the fluid from the bottom of the tank spills into a central collector located at the top for the capture of air bubbles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAeration: Aeration

Implementation Method 2

a first fraction of fluid that spills directly into a central collector via a cascade for the capture of new air bubbles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTurbulence: Turbulence

Implementation Method 3

a second fraction that spills to the central collector via a plurality of lateral collectors for surface agitation (degasification) of the fluid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical agitation: Stirring

Implementation Method 4

Once air bubbles are captured, they are dragged to the bottom of the tank by the impeller allowing, according to Henry's law, additional solubilisation of new air in the heart of the fluid due to the increase in pressure of the gas caused by the pressure of the column of fluid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHenry's law:

Implementation Method 5

aeration of the fluid takes place to facilitate the incorporation of atmospheric oxygen and therefore the aerobic digestion of the fluid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerobic digestion: Aerobic Digestion

Data Source

PatentEP2327471B1A reactor for aerobic treatment of fluids and process for aerobic treatment of a fluid to be treated
Publication Date: 2013.05.29 EDARMA
  • EP2327471B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2327471B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2327471B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Comprising a tank (2) and a central conduit (5), said conduit (5) including means (6, 7) of generating a descending flow of fluid inside it, and characterised by that fact that the entry (5a) of said fluid to said conduit (5) is arranged in association with a central collector (3) of fluid, with a first fraction of fluid spilling over the upper edge (3a) of said central collector (3), the level of fluid in the tank (2) being regulated so that said first fraction spills into said central collector (3) via a cascade (10), and by the fact that said reactor (1) additionally includes a plurality of lateral collectors (4) that connect to said central collector (3), with a second fraction of fluid spilling over the upper edge (4a) of said collectors (4) from the surface of the tank (2), each of said lateral collectors (4) including means (14, 15, 16) of interfering the fluid flow that falls inside them, these means (14, 15, 16) causing mechanical agitation of said second fraction of fluid before its arrival at the central collector (3). Fig 2.