Chemical Reactor Control Settings Using Generative ML for Polymer Discovery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for synthesizing polymers are laborious and rely heavily on human discretion, lacking efficiency in exploring optimal structure-activity relationships, as they involve manual prediction of chemical structures, synthesis schemes, and reactor control settings.

Innovation Solution

The use of generative machine learning models, such as variational autoencoders (VAE) and gain adversarial networks (GAN), to autonomously generate recommended chemical reactor control settings for the synthesis of polymers, based on past operation data, enabling efficient and autonomous control of chemical reactors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If conventional manual methods are used for polymer synthesis, then human discretion can be applied to predict chemical structures and synthesis schemes, but the process is laborious and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanual prediction capabilityVSAvoidtime required for polymer discovery
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical prediction processes with an automated machine learning system. The ML model processes historical chemical reactor data to generate predictions for chemical structures, synthesis schemes, and reactor control settings, eliminating the need for manual human analysis and significantly reducing discovery time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables autonomous self-service by allowing the machine learning model to independently generate and optimize polymer synthesis parameters without continuous human intervention. The model learns from historical data and automatically produces recommendations for new polymer discoveries, reducing labor requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If conventional manual methods are used for synthesizing polymers, then human expertise can guide the process, but the efficiency in exploring optimal structure-activity relationships is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehuman expertise guidanceVSAvoidefficiency of polymer discovery
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-training the machine learning model on extensive historical chemical reactor data before actual polymer discovery. This preliminary training enables the model to quickly generate reliable predictions during operation, combining the benefits of pre-computed knowledge with rapid exploration of new polymer possibilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a computational dimension to polymer discovery by using machine learning algorithms that can process and analyze multidimensional chemical data simultaneously. This enables efficient exploration of structure-activity relationships across multiple parameters at once, something that manual methods struggle to achieve.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Loss of time

If generative machine learning models are used to autonomously generate control settings, then time and labor are reduced, but the system requires processing vast amounts of chemical reactor data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetime required for polymer discoveryVSAvoiddata processing capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex data processing task into distinct functional modules: data collection from historical reactors, data preprocessing and cleaning, feature extraction, model training, and prediction generation. This segmentation makes the complex system more manageable and allows each component to be optimized independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces intermediate data structures and processing layers between the raw historical data and the final predictions. These intermediaries include processed training datasets, extracted features, and model representations that bridge the gap between vast historical data and actionable control settings, reducing the computational burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11520310B2Generating control settings for a chemical reactor
Publication Date: 2022.12.06 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US11520310B2 patent drawing
  • US11520310B2 patent drawing
  • US11520310B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques regarding autonomously controlling one or more chemical reactors using generative machine learning models are provided. For example, one or more embodiments described herein can comprise a system, which can comprise a memory that can store computer executable components. The system can also comprise a processor, operably coupled to the memory, and that can execute the computer executable components stored in the memory. The computer executable components can comprise a model component that can build a generative machine learning model based on training data regarding a past chemical reactor operation. The generative machine learning model can generate a recommended chemical reactor control setting for experimental discovery of a polymer.