Fluidized Bed Reactor Feed Distribution Assembly

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

As reactor diameters increase, achieving uniform distribution of liquid and gas feeds in fluidized bed reactors becomes difficult, leading to production inefficiencies and issues like coking, which results in poor distribution and performance.

Innovation Solution

A reactor and feed distribution assembly with a gaseous feed distribution assembly featuring a plurality of gas passageways with varying aperture sizes and a catalyst feed conduit system that ensures even distribution of gas and catalyst across the reactor bed, preventing coking and improving efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the reactor diameter is increased to handle larger production volumes, then productivity increases, but uniform distribution of liquid and gas feeds becomes difficult to attain

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction volumeVSAvoiduniform distribution of feeds
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The gas feed distribution assembly is segmented into multiple gas passageways (at least three) with varying aperture sizes, where each passageway distributes gas to different radial zones of the reactor bed. This segmentation allows tailored gas flow distribution across different regions, maintaining uniform feed distribution even in large-diameter reactors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different gas passageways have different aperture sizes specifically designed for their local requirements: passageways closer to the reactor wall have larger apertures while those near the center have smaller apertures. This local quality variation compensates for radial flow patterns and ensures uniform gas and liquid feed distribution across the entire reactor cross-section.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Device complexity

If traditional feed distribution methods are used in large diameter reactors, then device complexity remains low, but coking occurs resulting in poor distribution and performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedistribution assembly structureVSAvoidperformance consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The gas feed distribution assembly incorporates a catalyst feed conduit that is slidably housed within a catalyst feed conduit housing, allowing the conduit to move dynamically. This dynamic configuration prevents catalyst from dropping below the gas feed distribution assembly, ensuring consistent gas-catalyst contact and preventing coking that would otherwise occur with static configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The gas feed distribution assembly acts as an intermediary between the gas feed conduit and the reactor bed, distributing gas through multiple passageways with varying aperture sizes. This intermediary structure ensures uniform gas distribution across the bed, preventing the coking that would occur with direct injection methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If uniform gas distribution is achieved through multiple passageways with varying aperture sizes, then productivity and performance improve, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess efficiencyVSAvoidgas passageway configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The gas feed distribution assembly serves multiple functions simultaneously: it distributes gas through varying aperture sizes for uniform flow, houses the slidable catalyst feed conduit, provides thermal insulation through packing material, and prevents catalyst drop. This multi-functionality consolidates what would otherwise require multiple separate components, managing device complexity while achieving superior productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The assembly achieves uniform gas distribution and reduces catalyst usage, preventing coking and enhancing process efficiency by maintaining even distribution across the reactor bed, thereby improving performance compared to traditional reactors.

Implementation Method 1

the gaseous feed distribution assembly defines a plurality of gas passageways, each of the plurality of gas passageways being in fluid communication with the first surface and the second surface via first apertures and second apertures

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid distribution through apertures:

Implementation Method 2

distribution assembly insulation packing is disposed between a lower portion of refractory-lined inner wall surface and the gaseous feed assembly

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal insulation: Thermal Insulation

Implementation Method 3

a catalyst feed conduit that has a first end and a second end, the catalyst feed conduit extending through the refractory-lined inner wall surface and the outer wall surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravitational flow: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentEP2895261B1Fluidized bed reactor and feed distribution assembly
Publication Date: 2017.03.15 DOW GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES LLC
  • EP2895261B1 patent drawing
  • EP2895261B1 patent drawing
  • EP2895261B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments include a reactor and feed distribution assembly. The reactor and feed distribution assembly can include a reactor vessel, a gaseous feed conduit, a catalyst feed conduit, a catalyst feed conduit housing, and a catalyst backflow diverter.