Reactor Nozzle Cleaning Fluid Flow Distribution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current batch-wise heterogeneous processing systems face challenges with uncontrolled wear of solid reaction members, complex cleaning processes, and inefficient loading and unloading, particularly in reactors with soft and compressible gels, leading to reduced reactor life and increased operational costs.

Innovation Solution

A reactor design featuring a cylindrical flow distributor with a top, bottom, and peripheral wall, allowing for controlled vortex creation to trap and release solid reaction members, along with a nozzle system for efficient cleaning, enabling speedy and thorough cleaning and repeated batch processing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If solid reaction members are freely suspended and agitated in the fluid medium, then mixing and contact between phases is improved, but the solid reaction members are subjected to uncontrolled wear resulting in reduced life time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemixing efficiencyVSAvoidsolid reaction member lifetime
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The reactor is divided into distinct functional zones: a suspension zone at the bottom for mixing and a separation zone above for settling. This segmentation allows intensive mixing only where necessary while providing a calm environment for the majority of the reaction volume, reducing unnecessary wear on solid reaction members.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses periodic agitation cycles rather than continuous mixing. The agitator operates intermittently to achieve phase contact, then stops to allow settling. This periodic action reduces cumulative wear on solid reaction members while maintaining effective mass transfer during active mixing periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Ease of operation

If filtration or sedimentation steps are added to separate phases after batch processing, then phase separation is improved, but the overall process complexity and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephase separationVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reaction and separation functions are merged into a single reactor vessel. The reactor design incorporates both a suspension zone for reaction and a separation zone for settling, eliminating the need for separate filtration or sedimentation equipment. Phase separation occurs in-situ within the reactor through density-driven settling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the inherent density difference between the fluid medium and solid reaction members to achieve automatic phase separation. The design requires no additional separation aids, filters, or complex separation mechanisms - the phases separate themselves through gravity settling in the designated separation zone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If the concentration of solid reaction members is increased to improve reaction efficiency, then transformation rate is improved, but the risk of solid member destruction during agitation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransformation rateVSAvoidsolid reaction member integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Different regions of the reactor provide different hydrodynamic conditions: the suspension zone at the bottom provides gentle mixing suitable for high concentrations of soft gel members, while the upper separation zone provides a calm environment. This local differentiation of flow conditions allows high solid member concentrations without excessive mechanical stress.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the intensity and duration of agitation cycles based on the concentration of solid reaction members. For higher concentrations, the agitation is more gentle and shorter in duration, optimizing the balance between achieving adequate mixing for transformation and minimizing mechanical stress on the solid members.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Ease of operation

If cleaning nozzle is inserted via man hatch and cleaning process is performed as GMP-process, then cleaning thoroughness is improved, but the cleaning time and operational costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleaning thoroughnessVSAvoidcleaning time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The manual mechanical cleaning process is replaced with an automated fluid-based cleaning system. Cleaning fluid is pumped through distribution manifolds and sprayed onto internal surfaces using controlled spray patterns. This automated fluid cleaning achieves thorough GMP-compliant cleaning much faster than manual methods while maintaining documentation and consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The cleaning system operates continuously with fluid circulation and recirculation. Cleaning fluid is pumped, sprayed, collected, filtered, and recirculated through the system in a continuous cycle, maximizing cleaning efficiency and minimizing the time required to achieve thorough cleaning compared to intermittent manual cleaning operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design facilitates faster and more efficient loading and unloading, reduces wear on solid reaction members, and simplifies the cleaning process, significantly saving time and costs compared to prior art systems.

Implementation Method 1

a flow distributor (1) rotating about a longitudinal centre axis (L1) of the flow distributor (1) thereby creating a vortex (V)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVortex: Vortex Ring

Implementation Method 2

at least one nozzle (15) arranged to direct a flow of a cleaning fluid in a direction towards a longitudinal centre axis (L2) of the flow distributor (1)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid flow:

Data Source

PatentUS11291968B2Reactor comprising a nozzle for cleaning fluid, a kit and a method
Publication Date: 2022.04.05 SPINCHEM AB
  • US11291968B2 patent drawing
  • US11291968B2 patent drawing
  • US11291968B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention refers to a reactor and a method respectively for performing, by means of solid reaction members, a biological or chemical transformation, or physical or chemical trapping from, or release of agents to, a fluidic media, and a subsequent cleaning of the reactor, said reactor comprising a vessel (11) in which a transformation device (100) has been mounted. The invention also refers to a reactor kit comprising such reactor. The reactor comprises at least one nozzle (15) arranged on the longitudinal inner wall of the vessel (11). The at least one nozzle (15) is arranged to direct a flow of a cleaning fluid (CF) in a direction towards a longitudinal centre axis (L1) of a flow distributor (1) arranged in the vessel (11).