Chemical Reactor with Permeable Wall for Selective Oxidation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Chemical reactions involving overly reactive reactants or products often result in secondary reactions that lead to undesirable byproducts, limiting the yield of desired products and requiring complex and costly reactor designs and operations.

Innovation Solution

A chemical reactor design featuring a permeable wall with a catalyst coating and a non-permeable wall, where overly reactive reactants are diluted and controlled to minimize secondary reactions, allowing for higher yields of target products while reducing undesirable byproducts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional fixed-bed reactors operate at low conversions to avoid secondary reactions, then selectivity to desired product is improved, but productivity decreases and reactor volume increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveselectivity to desired productVSAvoidproduct yield per unit time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The reactor is divided into multiple zones: a first bed for primary reaction, a second bed for additional conversion, and intermediate separation zones. This segmentation allows the system to achieve high overall conversion while maintaining selectivity in each zone, avoiding the need to operate at uniformly low conversions throughout the entire reactor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A heat exchange medium acts as an intermediary between reaction zones, controlling temperature to prevent excessive heat buildup that drives secondary reactions. This thermal mediation enables higher conversions without sacrificing selectivity, resolving the contradiction between productivity and manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If alternative reaction pathways are used to avoid overly reactive reactants, then selectivity is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveselectivity to desired productVSAvoidreactor design complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple reaction pathways are merged into a single integrated reactor system with sequential beds and intermediate separation. This combines the benefits of alternative pathways (improved selectivity) while avoiding the complexity of multiple separate reactor systems, as the pathways are coordinated within one unified device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

Different sections of the reactor are designed with locally optimized conditions: the first bed uses specific catalysts and temperature profiles for initial conversion, while the second bed uses different conditions for further conversion. This local optimization maintains selectivity without requiring the entire reactor to be designed for a single complex pathway.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Manufacturing precision

If low single-pass conversion is operated to avoid secondary reactions, then selectivity is improved, but loss of time increases due to recycling requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveselectivity to desired productVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The reactor system maintains continuous forward progress through multiple conversion beds arranged in sequence, eliminating the need for recycling loops. Each bed contributes to overall conversion, allowing the system to achieve high selectivity and high conversion in a single continuous pass, thereby eliminating time loss associated with recycling operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

4Manufacturing precision

If complex reactor designs are used to handle overly reactive chemicals, then selectivity is improved, but ease of operation decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveselectivity to desired productVSAvoidoperational simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The reactor system incorporates self-regulating features where the sequential bed design and heat exchange mechanisms automatically manage reaction conditions. The system self-adjusts temperature and conversion levels across different zones, reducing the need for complex external control systems and making operation simpler while maintaining high selectivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The reactor design effectively reduces secondary reactions, achieving higher yields of desired products and lower formation of undesirable byproducts, thereby improving the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of chemical conversion processes.

Implementation Method 1

a first permeable wall characterized by an inner surface and an outer surface and a plurality of pores extending from the inner surface to the outer surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffusion: Diffusion

Implementation Method 2

the second flow passage being fluidly connected to the outer surface of the first permeable wall; a second permeable wall characterized by an inner surface and an outer surface and a plurality of pores extending from the inner surface to the outer surface; the second permeable wall supporting on its inner surface a catalyst

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Data Source

PatentUS10525434B1Chemical reactor for use with overly reactive chemicals
Publication Date: 2020.01.07 PRECISION COMBUSTION INC
  • US10525434B1 patent drawing
  • US10525434B1 patent drawing
  • US10525434B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A chemical reactor for use in a chemical process wherein a reactant and/or a target product is prone to produce undesirable byproducts through secondary reactions. The reactor is configured with a first flow passage for passing a flow of an overly reactive reactant; a permeable first wall for controlled flow of the overly reactive reactant into a second flow passage providing a flow of a second reactant; a permeable second wall having a catalyst supported on an inner surface thereof for catalyzing reaction of the reactants flowing in the second flow passage; the permeable second wall passing through a flow containing the target product; and a non-permeable third wall defining a third flow passage for exiting the product mixture. The reactor can be employed in selective oxidation, oxidative dehydrogenation, and alkylation processes to reduce the formation of byproducts.