Readability Awareness in NLP Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional natural language processing systems struggle to accurately determine a user's reading level based on limited text samples, leading to mismatched readability levels between user queries and retrieved document answers, which can result in unintelligible responses for users with lower reading abilities.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for electronic natural language processing that analyzes electronic text inputs to determine readability levels by identifying grammatical errors, slang terms, and misspelling types, allowing for tailored responses based on the user's reading level, using databases and parsing techniques to assess readability characteristics and provide relevant documents with matching or proximate readability levels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional systems analyze large datasets over several iterations to estimate reading level, then measurement precision improves, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereading level estimation accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of readability indicators (grammatical errors, slang terms, misspellings) on small text samples to pre-determine reading level estimates, avoiding the need for extensive iterative analysis of large datasets while maintaining acceptable accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system extracts specific readability indicators (grammatical errors, slang terms, misspellings) from text samples to estimate reading level, rather than analyzing entire large datasets, thereby reducing processing time while maintaining measurement precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Loss of information

If the system provides highly relevant document answers, then information quality improves, but ease of operation deteriorates for users with lower reading abilities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation qualityVSAvoiduser comprehension
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system adjusts the readability quality of specific portions of the response based on the user's determined reading level, modifying language complexity, sentence structure, and vocabulary to match the user's comprehension ability while preserving core information

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters such as sentence length, word complexity, and grammatical structure of the response based on the user's reading level determined from readability indicators, making the information accessible while maintaining relevance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10242092B2Readability awareness in natural language processing systems
Publication Date: 2019.03.26 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US10242092B2 patent drawing
  • US10242092B2 patent drawing
  • US10242092B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Electronic natural language processing in a natural language processing (NLP) system, such as a Question-Answering (QA) system. A receives electronic text input, in question form, and determines a readability level indicator in the question. The readability level indicator includes at least a grammatical error, a slang term, and a misspelling type. The computer determines a readability level for the electronic text input based on the readability level indicator, and retrieves candidate answers based on the readability level.