Readiness Assessment for Repairable Systems Using Probabilistic Maintenance Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional resource allocation techniques for electromechanical systems, such as aircraft, fail to accurately assess the relative readiness of systems post-maintenance, leading to inadequate selection for missions, as they only consider operability without accounting for the systems' relative status or degree of readiness.

Innovation Solution

An automated method and system that assesses the readiness of repairable systems by analyzing maintenance information using probabilistic processes like the modulated power law process, gamma renewal process, or homogenous Poisson process to determine the relative states of readiness, allowing for prioritization of maintenance resources and selection of systems most likely to successfully complete tasks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional resource allocation techniques are used to identify operational systems, then the systems can be selected for missions, but the relative degree of readiness cannot be determined

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemission success probabilityVSAvoidreadiness information
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary assessment layer between maintenance operations and mission allocation. This intermediary system evaluates the relative degree of readiness of repairable systems by analyzing maintenance information and applying probabilistic models, thereby providing the missing readiness information without directly altering the maintenance or allocation processes themselves.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the conventional binary operational/non-operational assessment mechanism with a probabilistic readiness assessment system. Instead of using simple yes/no criteria based on minimum equipment lists, the system substitutes a sophisticated analytical approach using modulated power law processes and gamma renewal processes to calculate relative readiness degrees.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If maintenance operations are performed on repairable systems, then the systems can be returned to operation, but the relative status or degree of readiness cannot be accurately assessed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem operabilityVSAvoidreadiness assessment accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the readiness assessment from a discrete binary parameter (operational/non-operational) to a continuous probabilistic parameter (relative degree of readiness). By changing the assessment parameter from a simple operational status to a probabilistic measure based on maintenance information analysis, the system achieves precise measurement of system readiness states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic assessment of system readiness by considering the temporal aspects of maintenance operations and their impact on system status. The readiness assessment is not static but dynamically calculated based on the specific maintenance operations performed, the system's history, and probabilistic models that evolve with new information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If systems are selected based only on minimum equipment list operability, then resource allocation is simple, but mission success probability is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation simplicityVSAvoidmission completion likelihood
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by implementing readiness assessment only for systems requiring mission allocation, rather than continuously assessing all systems. The assessment is triggered selectively when resource allocation decisions are needed, balancing the additional analytical effort with the specific need for informed decision-making at critical allocation points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS7580847B2Method, system and computer program product for analyzing maintenance operations and assessing the readiness of repairable systems
Publication Date: 2009.08.25 THE BOEING CO
  • US7580847B2 patent drawing
  • US7580847B2 patent drawing
  • US7580847B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An automated method, system and computer program product for assessing the readiness of a plurality of repairable systems, such as a fleet of aircraft, are provided. In addition to identifying the repairable systems that will be operational, the relative state of readiness of the repairable systems is determined such that the repairable systems that are most likely to successfully complete the designated task can be selected. Additionally, an automated method of analyzing the maintenance operations performed upon a plurality of repairable systems, such as a fleet of aircraft, is provided. In this regard, the relative states of readiness of the repairable systems are determined and maintenance resources are allocated based upon the respective measures of the relative states of readiness of the repairable systems. As such, maintenance operations scheduled for the aircraft that will have the greatest state of readiness upon completion of the maintenance operations can be prioritized.