Real Estate Recommendation System Using Feedback Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In the real estate industry, home buyers rely heavily on agent expertise to find comparable properties, lacking a systematic approach to make informed decisions based on buyer feedback.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that utilizes a listing recommendation server to receive and compare feedback from a real estate feedback application, determining comparable properties based on factors like square footage, price, location, and school district, and recommending properties based on weighted feedback trends.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If home buyers rely on agent expertise to identify alternate properties, then the quality of property recommendations may be improved through human judgment, but the efficiency and scalability of the recommendation process deteriorates due to manual limitations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality of property recommendationsVSAvoidefficiency of property search
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an automated recommendation system as an intermediary between buyers and agents. This system processes buyer feedback and property data to generate recommendations, acting as a mediator that combines automated efficiency with the quality standards that agents previously provided manually.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical process of agent-based property recommendation with an automated computational system. The system uses algorithms to analyze feedback data and generate recommendations, substituting human manual work with automated processing while maintaining or improving recommendation quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Loss of information

If a systematic approach based on buyer feedback is implemented, then the information quality for decision-making is improved, but the system complexity increases due to data collection and processing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation quality for decisionsVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a multi-functional system that handles multiple tasks: collecting feedback from various sources, processing and analyzing the data, generating recommendations, and providing them to users. This universal system consolidates multiple functions into a single platform, managing complexity through integration rather than multiplication of separate systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback loop where buyer feedback is continuously collected, processed, and used to improve recommendations. The system learns from feedback patterns and refines its algorithms over time, using the feedback mechanism itself to manage and reduce information loss while adapting to user preferences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If automated recommendation systems are deployed, then the productivity and scalability of property matching is improved, but the reliability of recommendations may worsen due to lack of human judgment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescalability of property matchingVSAvoidtrustworthiness of recommendations
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables the system to serve itself by automatically processing feedback data and generating recommendations without requiring constant human intervention. The automated system maintains and improves its own performance through continuous data processing, reducing the need for manual oversight while maintaining reliability through algorithmic consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary actions by pre-processing and analyzing feedback data before formal recommendation generation. The system prepares recommendation candidates in advance based on accumulated feedback, ensuring that when recommendations are generated, they are based on thoroughly pre-analyzed data, thereby maintaining reliability through advance preparation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10929911B2Method and system for a real estate recommendation application
Publication Date: 2021.02.23 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US10929911B2 patent drawing
  • US10929911B2 patent drawing
  • US10929911B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method to provide feedback associated with a real estate property including providing access to a subject real estate property via a system including at least a listing recommendation server that communicates with a real estate feedback application; receiving feedback regarding the subject real estate property from a handheld device operating the real estate feedback application; determining comparable properties in response to the feedback on the subject real estate property.