Real Estate Listing Evaluation Engine Using ML Scoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is no objective means to assess the quality of real estate property descriptions, which can impact the success and speed of property sales due to errors or ineffective wording.

Innovation Solution

A machine learning model is trained to score real estate property listing descriptions based on features such as grammatical mistakes, sentiment, and inclusion of real estate features, enabling objective evaluation and potential automated generation of improved descriptions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual property description writing is used, then flexibility and creativity in description can be maintained, but objective quality assessment cannot be achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality assessment precisionVSAvoidevaluation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual human evaluation of property descriptions with an automated machine learning system. The ML model objectively scores descriptions based on multiple features including grammar, sentiment, and real estate terminology, eliminating subjective human assessment while maintaining high measurement precision through systematic feature analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables property listings to be automatically evaluated without requiring external human reviewers. The ML model independently assesses description quality by analyzing textual features and comparing against trained criteria, allowing the system to serve itself in the evaluation process without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If automated machine learning evaluation is implemented, then objective quality scoring is achieved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation objectivityVSAvoidmachine learning system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The evaluation system is divided into distinct modular components: text preprocessing module, feature extraction module (analyzing grammar, sentiment, terminology), machine learning scoring module, and feedback generation module. This segmentation allows each component to be independently developed, tested, and maintained, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediate processing layers between raw text input and final quality scores. Feature extraction acts as an intermediary that transforms unstructured text into structured numerical features, which then feed into the ML model. This intermediary layer simplifies the core evaluation logic and improves system reliability through systematic data transformation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If detailed feature analysis is performed on descriptions, then scoring accuracy improves, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescoring accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary text preprocessing and feature extraction before the main ML scoring operation. By pre-processing the text to identify and structure key features (grammar errors, sentiment indicators, real estate terminology) before they reach the scoring model, the system prepares data in advance, enabling faster and more accurate scoring without redundant processing during the main evaluation phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a multi-tiered analysis approach where the system performs detailed feature analysis only when necessary to achieve accurate scoring. The ML model selectively focuses on the most discriminative features for each description type, performing partial analysis on less critical aspects while maintaining high scoring accuracy through focused examination of key quality indicators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20250148557A1Real estate listing evaluation engine
Publication Date: 2025.05.08 FEVR LLC
  • US20250148557A1 patent drawing
  • US20250148557A1 patent drawing
  • US20250148557A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are some implementations of systems, apparatus, methods and computer program products for implementing a real estate listing description analysis engine. The engine can generate a summary of a description or a new description based upon analysis of the description.