Automated Real Estate Valuation System with Conditional Operator Review

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems face challenges in accurately determining the value of real-estate properties, leading to potential inaccuracies that can result in lost profits or incorrect loan rejections, due to the reliance on automated models that may skew values based on new construction properties or interior conditions.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a system that selectively prompts operators to review automatically generated real-estate property values only under specific conditions, such as a high ratio of new construction property sales or significant differences in interior conditions, to ensure accuracy before providing the values to interested entities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated models are used to determine property values, then productivity is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalue determination speedVSAvoidproperty value accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary review process where operator review is triggered by specific conditions (high new construction ratio, significant interior condition differences). This intermediary layer filters cases that need human judgment while allowing automated processing for standard cases, thus maintaining productivity while improving precision for problematic cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameters of value determination by dynamically adjusting the level of automation based on detected conditions. When certain parameters (new construction ratio, interior condition variance) exceed thresholds, the system transitions from fully automated to operator-reviewed mode, optimizing both speed and accuracy based on case characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If operator review is implemented for all automated values, then measurement precision is improved, but productivity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproperty value accuracyVSAvoidvalue determination speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of applying operator review to all cases (excessive action), the system applies it partially only to cases meeting specific risk criteria. This selective approach provides sufficient human oversight for problematic cases while avoiding unnecessary manual review for straightforward cases, thus maintaining productivity while improving precision where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the value determination process into automated processing and operator review components, with clear criteria for when each should be applied. This segmentation allows the system to handle the majority of cases automatically while directing only problematic cases to human reviewers, optimizing the balance between speed and accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of operation

If automated models are used without conditions, then ease of operation is improved, but reliability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidvalue determination reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from a static automated model to a dynamic hybrid system that automatically adjusts its operation mode based on detected conditions. The system remains simple to operate (no user input needed) while dynamically determining whether to apply automated processing or operator review based on case-specific parameters, thus maintaining ease of operation while improving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11526915B2Automated value determination system
Publication Date: 2022.12.13 OPENDOOR LABS INC
  • US11526915B2 patent drawing
  • US11526915B2 patent drawing
  • US11526915B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are disclosed for receiving, from a client device, a request to generate a value for a subject real-estate property, searching a database to identify a plurality of real-estate properties that have previously been sold, and automatically generating, based on a sale price of each of the plurality of real-estate properties, the value for the subject real-estate property. The systems and methods further provide for computing a collective physical state of the plurality of real-estate properties, determining whether the collective physical state corresponds to a threshold, and generating a prompt, based on the determination of whether the collective physical state corresponds to the threshold, for display on an operator device to review the automatically generated value before the value is presented to the client device.