Simulated Driving Performance Assessment With Real-Event Scenarios

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems lack an effective method to assess and improve the driving performance of vehicle operators, particularly in simulated driving scenarios, which are essential for both human drivers and autonomous algorithms, as they fail to accurately mimic real-life driving situations and provide actionable feedback.

Innovation Solution

A system that utilizes a fleet of vehicles equipped with sensors and processors to detect vehicle events, generate simulation scenarios based on real-life driving situations, and assess operator performance through simulated driving experiences, allowing for the creation of simulation scenarios that mimic actual events and provide metrics on operator performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If simulation scenarios are created based on real-life driving situations, then the realism and applicability of simulations improve, but the complexity of data collection and processing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverealism of simulation scenariosVSAvoidcomplexity of data collection system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex data collection task by distributing sensors across multiple vehicles in a fleet. Each vehicle independently collects and processes its own driving data, then contributes to the overall simulation scenario database. This division reduces the complexity burden on any single vehicle while maintaining comprehensive real-life scenario coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each vehicle in the fleet autonomously collects, processes, and stores its own driving data using onboard sensors and computing resources. The vehicles self-generate simulation scenarios from their operational data without requiring centralized data collection infrastructure, thereby reducing system complexity while improving realism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If individual vehicles collect and process driving data locally, then data processing speed improves, but the hardware resources required on each vehicle increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata processing speedVSAvoidhardware resources per vehicle
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Vehicles perform partial data processing locally to capture critical events and generate preliminary simulation scenarios, then upload raw or partially processed data to centralized servers for comprehensive processing. This approach achieves fast initial processing while distributing the full computational burden across the fleet infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces centralized computing servers as intermediaries between vehicles and the simulation scenario database. Vehicles upload data to these intermediaries, which handle heavy processing tasks, reducing the hardware requirements on individual vehicles while maintaining high overall processing speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive metrics are used to assess operator performance, then the accuracy of performance evaluation improves, but the complexity of analysis and feedback generation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of performance evaluationVSAvoidcomplexity of analysis system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system evaluates different aspects of operator performance using specialized metrics tailored to specific driving scenarios and event types. Rather than applying a single complex analysis framework to all data, it uses context-appropriate evaluation methods for each scenario type, improving accuracy while managing complexity through localized analysis strategies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements multi-level feedback mechanisms where performance metrics are calculated at multiple stages: immediate feedback from simulation results, intermediate feedback from scenario completion analysis, and comprehensive feedback from aggregated performance data. This staged feedback approach breaks down complex analysis into manageable components while maintaining high evaluation accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12008922B2Systems and methods for comparing driving performance for simulated driving
Publication Date: 2024.06.11 SMARTDRIVE SYSTEMS INC
  • US12008922B2 patent drawing
  • US12008922B2 patent drawing
  • US12008922B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This disclosure relates to a system that determines driving performance by a vehicle operator for simulated driving of a simulated vehicle in a simulation engine. Individual vehicle event scenarios correspond to vehicle events. Individual simulation scenarios correspond to individual vehicle event scenarios. A vehicle operator, e.g., an autonomous driving algorithm, operates the simulated vehicle in the simulation engine for a set of simulation scenarios. One or more metrics quantify the performance of the vehicle operator based on simulated results.