Real-Time Boot Sequencing for Dependency-Managed Vehicle Components

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle systems lack efficient and secure methods for managing the booting and operation of critical and noncritical components based on dependencies, leading to inefficiencies and potential delays in functionality.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that prioritizes the booting and operation of critical components first, followed by noncritical components based on dependencies, utilizing a decentralized database like blockchain for secure and efficient management of vehicle operations and data sharing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If all vehicle components are powered and operated simultaneously, then complete functionality is achieved, but energy consumption increases and boot time is extended

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveboot speedVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The vehicle system is segmented into critical and noncritical components. Critical components (powertrain, braking, steering) are powered and operated separately from noncritical components (infotainment, climate control). This segmentation enables selective activation based on operational necessity, reducing overall energy consumption while maintaining essential vehicle functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Critical components are powered and initialized before noncritical components during system boot-up. This preliminary action ensures that essential vehicle functions are ready before optional features are activated, enabling faster operational readiness for critical systems while deferring energy-intensive noncritical operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Loss of energy

If critical components are prioritized for booting, then energy efficiency improves, but system complexity increases due to dependency management

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic component activation based on real-time operational requirements. The controller continuously assesses which components are critical for current vehicle operations and activates only those components, rather than using a static all-or-nothing approach. This dynamic management reduces energy waste while the complexity is handled through automated controller logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

A centralized controller acts as an intermediary between power sources and vehicle components. This controller manages the complexity of dependency relationships by automatically determining which components need power based on operational context, shielding the rest of the system from the complexity of manual dependency management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If a decentralized database like blockchain is used, then data security and tamper-proofing are enhanced, but processing time and computational overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata securityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements selective blockchain integration rather than using it for all data operations. Blockchain is applied only to critical data requiring maximum security and immutability (ownership records, service history, authorization tokens), while less critical data uses traditional storage methods. This partial application maintains security where needed without incurring blockchain processing overhead for all operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

Different data types are stored with different security mechanisms based on their specific requirements. Sensitive data requiring tamper-proof storage is placed on the blockchain, while routine operational data uses conventional databases. This local quality approach applies the computationally intensive blockchain technology only where its security benefits are most valuable, optimizing the balance between security and processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12464046B2Real time boot for secure distributed systems
Publication Date: 2025.11.04 TOYOTA MOTOR NORTH AMERICA INC
  • US12464046B2 patent drawing
  • US12464046B2 patent drawing
  • US12464046B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An example operation includes one or more of powering, by a transport, one or more critical components, running, by the transport, a first set of applications on the one or more critical components, responsive to a dependency of one or more noncritical components on the one or more critical components, powering, by the transport, the one or more noncritical components, and running, by the transport, a second set of applications on the one or more noncritical components.