Answer Assistance Through Real-Time Passage Citations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Customer support software struggles to effectively address complex and unpredictable customer interactions, often requiring CSAs to adapt their responses on the fly, leading to inefficiencies and reduced customer satisfaction.

Innovation Solution

An answer assistance computing system that uses language models to generate contextually relevant answers with citations, leveraging conversation representations and knowledge bases to provide transparent and trustworthy information to CSAs in real-time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If customer support software uses standard procedures and pre-defined responses, then operational simplicity is maintained, but the ability to address complex and unpredictable customer interactions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational simplicityVSAvoidability to address complex interactions
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by automatically generating contextually relevant responses for CSAs without requiring manual lookup or adaptation. The language model processes conversation history and customer context to autonomously generate appropriate responses, freeing CSAs from manual effort while handling complex interactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts response generation based on changing parameters such as conversation context, customer sentiment, and interaction history. By continuously analyzing these parameters and adapting the generated responses accordingly, the system maintains operational simplicity while achieving high adaptability to complex scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If CSAs manually retrieve and adapt information during conversations, then response accuracy can be maintained, but time consumption and inefficiency increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse accuracyVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing conversation history and customer context to generate response options before the CSA needs to respond. This advance preparation ensures accurate, contextually relevant responses are ready immediately, eliminating time consumption while maintaining high reliability through thorough preliminary analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces the mechanical process of manual information retrieval and adaptation with an automated language model. This substitution eliminates the time-consuming manual operations while maintaining or improving response accuracy through the model's ability to analyze context and generate precise responses automatically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If customer support software provides automated responses, then efficiency is improved, but transparency and trustworthiness of information may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupport efficiencyVSAvoidtransparency and trustworthiness
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms by providing citations and source references alongside generated responses. This allows CSAs and customers to verify the origin and accuracy of information, maintaining transparency and trustworthiness while benefiting from the efficiency of automated response generation. The feedback loop ensures accountability and buildsv trust.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system acts as an intermediary between the knowledge base and the CSA/customer by generating responses with explicit citations to source materials. This intermediary role maintains transparency by showing where information comes from, while still providing the efficiency benefits of automated processing. The citations serve as a bridge ensuring trustworthiness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20250315458A1Answer assistance computing system
Publication Date: 2025.10.09 INTERCOM INC
  • US20250315458A1 patent drawing
  • US20250315458A1 patent drawing
  • US20250315458A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Technology is disclosed for programmatically generate answers for a user that are responsive to aspects of a conversation, which may be occurring in near real-time. In one implementation, a conversation record is processed to determine a conversation representation and corresponding representation embedding. The representation embedding is used to determine a set of relevant passages of documents within a knowledge base. An answer-generation input instruction for a language model is generated based on the conversation representation, aspects of the relevant passages, and an answer-format instruction. The language model is directed to produce an answer output that includes accessible, passage-level citations for each portion of the answer derived from a particular passage the knowledge base, enabling a user to directly access the relevant passage. The generated answer, along with the citations, is presented via a user interface, thereby improving the efficiency and quality of user assistance.