Real-Time Client Matching System for Financial Transactions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for facilitating transactions between potential participants and solicitations in financial instrument brokering often result in delays and suboptimal pairings, leading to reduced profitability due to inefficiencies in timeliness and compatibility matching.

Innovation Solution

A real-time actionable intelligence system that compiles historical activity data, defines client scores using models, and identifies recommended clients based on client coverage data and predetermined rules to facilitate optimal transaction pairings, with the ability to update recommendations dynamically based on user feedback.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If conventional techniques are used for facilitating transactions, then the system is simple to operate, but transaction timeliness deteriorates and pairing optimality is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction timelinessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-compiles historical activity data for multiple potential clients and pre-calculates compatibility scores before transactions are needed. This preliminary preparation enables rapid matching when solicitations arise, improving transaction timeliness without requiring complex real-time processing during actual transactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The matching system is segmented into independent modular components: data compilation module, scoring module using machine learning models, rule evaluation module, and recommendation module. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently and processed in parallel, improving overall system speed while maintaining manageability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Speed

If transaction processing is accelerated, then timeliness improves, but pairing optimality deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction processing speedVSAvoidpairing optimality
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs comprehensive compatibility assessments and calculates optimal pairings in advance using machine learning models trained on historical data. These pre-computed optimal matchings are stored and can be rapidly retrieved when solicitations occur, ensuring both speed and optimality without trade-off.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system skips unnecessary intermediate processing steps by using pre-computed compatibility scores and pre-established rules. When a solicitation arrives, the system directly matches against pre-prepared candidate lists with known compatibility metrics, rushing through the matching process while maintaining optimality through prior thorough analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive client analysis is performed, then pairing quality improves, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepairing qualityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs comprehensive client analysis, including historical activity review and compatibility scoring, in advance before solicitations are received. This preliminary comprehensive analysis creates a ready pool of pre-evaluated candidates, allowing rapid selection later without re-performing the detailed analysis, thus improving pairing quality while minimizing processing time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the depth of analysis based on available time and solicitation urgency. For time-critical solicitations, it uses pre-computed scores and simplified matching. For non-urgent cases, it performs more comprehensive real-time analysis. This dynamic approach optimizes the balance between pairing quality and processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12062096B2Method and system for providing actionable intelligence
Publication Date: 2024.08.13 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK NA
  • US12062096B2 patent drawing
  • US12062096B2 patent drawing
  • US12062096B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for providing actionable intelligence in real-time to facilitate a plurality of transactions is disclosed. The method includes compiling historical activity data for potential clients; defining, by using a model, a score for each of the potential clients based on the compiled historical activity data; receiving, via an event stream, a request, the request relating to a transaction request for a financial instrument; retrieving client coverage data that corresponds to the potential clients, the client coverage data including a strategic client plan that relates to development of client relationships; identifying a predetermined rule that corresponds to the request; and automatically determining, in real-time for the request, a recommended client from the potential clients based on at least one from among the score, the client coverage data, the corresponding predetermined rule, and the historical activity data.