Real-Time Error Debugging via Traffic Pausing and Isolation
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Current debugging techniques fail to effectively freeze the state of a machine during runtime errors, particularly in mainline traffic failures, and do not address interface and retention issues efficiently, leading to costly spares invocation and limited real-time correction capabilities.
Innovation Solution
A computer-implemented method that pauses mainline traffic, isolates interface or retention issues, determines error types, applies corrective actions based on stored solutions, and resumes traffic, enabling real-time debugging and error resolution.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If traditional debugging techniques are used to locate and fix bugs, then errors can be identified and resolved, but system downtime increases and productivity decreases
Solution Approach 1:
The system performs preliminary actions by creating checkpoint snapshots and preparing rollback states before debugging operations begin. This allows the system to quickly restore to a known good state if needed, reducing overall downtime while maintaining error resolution capability
Solution Approach 2:
The system creates copies of system state data at checkpoints during normal operation. These copies enable debugging analysis without requiring the actual production system to be stopped, allowing continuous operation while errors are investigated and fixed in isolated environments
2Measurement precision
If mainline traffic is paused for real-time debugging, then interface and retention issues can be isolated and diagnosed, but system productivity decreases
Solution Approach 1:
The system segments the debugging process into distinct phases: checkpoint creation during normal traffic flow, isolated analysis phase with paused traffic, and restoration phase. This allows precise error diagnosis during the isolated phase while minimizing impact on overall productivity by keeping other segments operating normally
Solution Approach 2:
The system introduces checkpoint data as an intermediary representation of system state. Instead of pausing traffic to examine actual live data, the debugging process analyzes checkpoint snapshots, which serve as safe intermediaries that preserve error states without requiring continuous traffic interruption
3Productivity
If debugging operations are performed without checkpoints, then system operation continues uninterrupted, but error isolation and state preservation become difficult
Solution Approach 1:
The system performs preliminary actions by establishing checkpoints at predetermined intervals or trigger points during normal operation. These checkpoints capture essential system state data before errors manifest or escalate, enabling later error isolation without requiring continuous interruption of productive operations
Solution Approach 2:
The debugging system serves itself by automatically creating and managing checkpoints without external intervention. The system monitors its own state, identifies when checkpoints should be created, and autonomously preserves error states, reducing the need for manual debugging operations that would interrupt productivity
Data Source
AI summary
In an approach to improve resolving defects within computer hardware, programs, software, or systems, embodiments pause mainline traffic and isolating interface or retention issues, and determine one or more types of errors in an event of a mainline traffic fail, wherein debug techniques are applied to fail information to resolve or further diagnose the one or more types of errors, and wherein the debug techniques are tracked and categorized. Additionally, embodiments apply corrective read actions to a detected error based on previously stored corrective actions associated with the detected error, and responsive to identifying no additional actions are required, restoring a collected system data. Further, embodiments, resume the paused mainline traffic.