Real-Time Performance Scoring System Using Live and Recorded Judge Inputs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for evaluating and scoring performances in competitions, such as cheerleading or figure skating, are subjective and prone to inaccuracies due to the rapid pace of events and changing scoring rubrics, often requiring judges to rely on recorded performances rather than real-time observations, leading to inefficiencies in generating final scores.

Innovation Solution

A system and method utilizing a computing device to generate real-time scores by combining scores from judges who view the performance live and those who review recordings, with a processor accessing scoring rubrics to determine scores and update rankings dynamically, ensuring accuracy and efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If judges rely on recorded performances to evaluate, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescoring accuracyVSAvoidtime to generate final score
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically recording the performance and pre-processing the video data during the performance itself. Judges can review recorded segments without delaying the final score generation, as the recording infrastructure is already in place and data is being captured in real-time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary automated scoring system that processes performance data independently. Multiple judges provide scores that are automatically aggregated and processed by the system, reducing the time any single judge needs to spend while maintaining precision through multiple evaluations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If multiple judges evaluate different performance attributes, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation accuracyVSAvoidjudging system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the evaluation process by assigning different judges to evaluate specific performance attributes (e.g., building skills, tumbling skills, overall routine). Each judge focuses on a subset of criteria, and the system automatically aggregates these segmented evaluations into a comprehensive score.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The judging system is designed as a universal platform that can handle multiple performance attributes and multiple judges simultaneously. The same system infrastructure supports various sports and competition types, reducing overall complexity through standardized multi-functional design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If judges review recorded performance segments, then measurement precision is improved, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescoring accuracyVSAvoidscoring speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system maintains continuity of useful action by allowing judges to review recorded segments without interrupting the overall scoring process. The recording and review can occur parallel to other judging activities, and the automated system continuously processes and aggregates scores without waiting for individual judge reviews to complete.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates copies of the performance recording that can be accessed by multiple judges simultaneously. Each judge receives a copy or access to the same recorded performance data, eliminating the need for sequential review and enabling parallel processing of evaluations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Productivity

If real-time score generation is implemented, then productivity is improved, but measurement precision may worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescore generation speedVSAvoidscoring accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary data collection and preparation during the performance, with scores being calculated and displayed in real-time as judges input their evaluations. This preliminary processing maintains productivity while ensuring precision through systematic aggregation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where scores are continuously updated and displayed in real-time. Judges can see their inputs being processed and aggregated, allowing for immediate verification and correction if needed, thus maintaining both speed and accuracy through continuous feedback loops.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20240127592A1System and method for generating a real-time score of a performance
Publication Date: 2024.04.18 KINGSBURY GLENN
  • US20240127592A1 patent drawing
  • US20240127592A1 patent drawing
  • US20240127592A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for generating a real-time score of a performance based upon one or more scores provided by one or more judges, with at least one judge watching and scoring the performance live, and with at least one judge watching and scoring a recoding of the performance. A combined or final score is output in real-time to a display.