Real-Time Quality Estimation for Document Classification Validation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems for validating data lack real-time, dynamic measurement and display of best-case quality estimates during the review of randomly selected validation sets, leading to inefficient resource allocation and potential quality threshold misses, especially in large teams.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that dynamically and in real-time measure and display the best-case estimate of quality results for document classification processes by creating a random validation set, allowing users to monitor and terminate or adjust the review process based on predetermined quality thresholds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a random validation set is reviewed to validate document classification quality, then measurement precision of quality results is improved, but loss of time increases due to manual review requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality measurement precisionVSAvoidreview time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements real-time feedback by continuously calculating and displaying the best-case quality estimate as documents are reviewed. This allows reviewers to immediately see how current review results impact the overall quality assessment, enabling dynamic adjustment of review strategies and early termination when quality thresholds are met or breached.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-calculating the best-case quality estimate based on current review results and remaining documents. This allows the system to predict future quality outcomes before complete review, enabling early decisions about whether to continue or terminate the review process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If complete review of validation set is performed to ensure quality threshold, then reliability of quality assessment is improved, but productivity decreases due to extended review duration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality assessment reliabilityVSAvoidreview productivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the review process by continuously recalculating the best-case quality estimate as each document is reviewed. This dynamic approach allows the review process to adapt in real-time, potentially terminating early when the best-case estimate indicates the threshold cannot be met, or confirming quality when the threshold is confidently achieved, thereby improving productivity without sacrificing reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables partial action by allowing termination of the review process before completing all validation documents when the best-case quality estimate already indicates whether the threshold will be met. This avoids the excessive action of reviewing all documents when early results already provide sufficient confidence in the quality assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Loss of time

If real-time dynamic measurement is implemented, then loss of time is reduced through early termination, but device complexity increases due to continuous calculation requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereview timeVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically calculating the best-case quality estimate and determining whether to terminate the review process without requiring manual intervention. The system monitors its own progress, performs its own quality assessment, and makes its own termination decisions based on predetermined thresholds, thereby reducing the need for complex external control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Measurement precision

If best-case estimate calculation is performed continuously, then measurement precision of quality trends is improved, but use of energy increases due to continuous processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality trend precisionVSAvoidprocessing energy
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic action by calculating the best-case quality estimate at regular intervals or upon completion of each document review rather than continuously during the review process. This periodic approach maintains measurement precision for quality trends while significantly reducing energy consumption compared to truly continuous calculation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS9477750B2System and method for real-time dynamic measurement of best-estimate quality levels while reviewing classified or enriched data
Publication Date: 2016.10.25 MSC INTPROP
  • US9477750B2 patent drawing
  • US9477750B2 patent drawing
  • US9477750B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system, method and computer program product for validating a document classification process, including a document collection; a document classification process performed on the document collection; a random selection module configured to automatically generate a random validation set of documents from the document collection; and a document review process performed on the random validation set of documents to validate results of the document classification process. The system, method and computer program product are configured to dynamically and in real-time measure and display on a computer display device a best case estimate of a quality of the results of the document classification process based on the documents that are validated, and given a size of a total data set of the document collection.