Real-Time Transaction Security via Payment Likelihood Indicators

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for real-time transaction processing in electronic transactions lack immediate satisfaction and sufficient security for sending entities, as they do not provide real-time funds availability and rely on outdated batch data for fraud prevention.

Innovation Solution

A system that facilitates real-time determination of funds availability by interacting between financial institutions through a network, using a processing mechanism that receives inquiries from one financial institution, sends them to another, and provides payment likelihood indicators based on current account data, enabling informed decision-making on transaction approval or denial.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If real-time inquiry system is implemented, then transaction processing speed is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction processing speedVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is divided into distinct functional modules: inquiry receiving module, data retrieval module, fraud detection module, and response generation module. Each module handles a specific aspect of the transaction verification process, allowing independent optimization and maintenance while achieving real-time processing capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A centralized processing system acts as an intermediary between sending and receiving financial institutions. This mediator coordinates the real-time inquiry process, manages data flow between institutions, and provides the fraud detection logic, thereby simplifying the overall system architecture while enabling real-time processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If current account data is used for fraud detection, then security is improved, but data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoiddata processing requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Account data including balance information and transaction history is pre-retrieved and prepared before the actual fraud detection analysis. This preliminary data preparation reduces the computational burden during the critical real-time verification phase, allowing secure fraud detection without excessive processing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system retrieves and processes only the specific account data relevant to the current transaction inquiry, rather than processing all available data. This targeted approach focuses computational resources on the critical security verification while minimizing overall data processing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If real-time funds availability determination is implemented, then transaction reliability is improved, but processing time requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction reliabilityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system maintains continuous connection and data exchange between financial institutions through the network infrastructure. Account data is kept current and readily accessible, eliminating the need for periodic batch updates and enabling continuous real-time verification without interruption or delay.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The necessary account verification data is retrieved and prepared in advance of the actual transaction authorization decision. This preliminary data gathering ensures that when the real-time determination is needed, the information is already available, maintaining both reliability and speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20180121975A1Providing security in electronic real-time transactions
Publication Date: 2018.05.03 EARLY WARNING SERVICES LLC
  • US20180121975A1 patent drawing
  • US20180121975A1 patent drawing
  • US20180121975A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system including one or more processors and one or more non-transitory computer-readable media storing computing instructions configured to run on the one or more processors and perform various acts. The acts can include receiving a request to register a second entity under a security status. The request can include a public identifier for the second entity. The acts also can include registering the second entity under the security status after receiving confirmation that the public identifier corresponds to the second entity and that the second account is held by the second entity. The acts additionally can include providing, to a first entity, first information that identifies the second entity as satisfying the security status. The first entity can have enrolled a first account maintained at a first institution in real-time transactions. The acts further can include receiving an authorization from the first entity to handle a statement using the first account. The statement can originate from the second entity. The acts additionally can include facilitating a real-time transaction. Other embodiments are provided.