Reamer Cutter Configuration for Hard Formations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional reamers designed to match drill bits experience misalignment in operation characteristics due to different wear rates and phenomena in various formations, leading to vibrations, tool failures, and increased operational costs in deep and abrasive formations.

Innovation Solution

A reamer design with varying cutter sizes, shapes, and parameters across different rows, including hole-opening, hole-maintaining, and back-reaming sets, to enhance wear resistance, efficiency, and aggressiveness, while maintaining proper weight distribution and dynamic performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional reamers are designed to match drill bits with identical cutter configurations, then initial operational compatibility is achieved, but misalignment develops during operation due to different wear rates in various formations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational compatibilityVSAvoidcutter configuration consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The reamer employs different cutter configurations at different locations along its body. Specifically, the reamer includes a first set of cutters with first parameters and a second set of cutters with second parameters, where the parameters differ between the two sets. This local differentiation allows each cutter set to be optimized for specific formation conditions it will encounter, preventing the misalignment that occurs when all cutters are identical and subject to uniform wear patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The reamer is segmented into multiple cutter sets with distinct characteristics. The cutters are arranged in different rows (leading, trailing, intermediate) with varying parameters such as cutter diameter, back rake angle, and exposure. This segmentation allows each segment to handle specific drilling challenges independently, maintaining operational reliability even as different segments wear at different rates in abrasive formations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If reamer cutters are made larger and more aggressive to handle hard formations, then drilling efficiency improves, but tool wear increases and leads to more frequent failures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrilling efficiencyVSAvoidtool failure rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Different cutter sets are designed with locally optimized qualities suitable for their specific functions. Leading row cutters may have larger diameters and greater exposure for aggressive hole opening in hard formations, while trailing and intermediate row cutters have different parameters optimized for maintaining and finishing the hole. This local optimization allows the reamer to maintain high drilling efficiency without requiring all cutters to be overly aggressive, thereby reducing overall tool wear and failure rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of manufacture

If reamer cutters are uniformly configured to simplify manufacturing, then production cost decreases, but performance in varied formations deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutter configuration simplicityVSAvoidformation condition adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The reamer incorporates cutters with different local qualities - varying diameters, back rake angles, and exposures - to adapt to different formation conditions. Leading row cutters may have different parameters than trailing row cutters, allowing the reamer to effectively handle both hard abrasive formations and softer formations encountered during drilling operations, thereby improving versatility without requiring complete uniformity in cutter design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Productivity

If reamer and drill bit operate in series through different formations, then complete hole drilling is achieved, but vibration increases due to mismatched operational characteristics

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrilling completionVSAvoidvibration
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The reamer's cutter configuration is locally optimized to better match the drill bit's operational characteristics. By varying cutter parameters such as diameter, back rake angle, and exposure across different rows, the reamer can maintain more consistent cutting conditions with the drill bit, reducing the operational mismatch that causes vibration when both tools pass through the same formations with varying rock properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP2885482B1Reamer with improved performance characteristics in hard and abrasive formations
Publication Date: 2020.09.23 CHEVRON USA INC
  • EP2885482B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2885482B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2885482B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A reamer is designed to enhance operation of a bottom hole assembly in which it is included. One or more capabilities and/or characteristics of the cutters carried by the reamer blocks of the reamer may be varied even in the same profile portion to enhance the functionality and/or durability of the reamer.