Vehicle Rear Body Support Frame Impact Force Distribution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle rear body structures face challenges in absorbing impact forces during collisions, leading to deformation and potential hydrogen leakage, with existing support frames concentrating stress and causing undue elastic deformation.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle rear body structure design featuring a support frame connected to both the floor frames and rear frames, with a cross member and collar system to distribute impact forces, a rear frame lower member for additional support, and a partition wall to prevent hydrogen leakage, enhancing rigidity and safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If the support frame is connected to the rear brackets and rear frames, then the impact force is transmitted to the side sills and floor frames, but the rear frames and support frame undergo great plastic deformation at central portions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact force transmissionVSAvoidstructural strength
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The invention divides the impact force transmission path into multiple segments by introducing intermediate transmission members (first and second transmission members) between the support frame and rear frames. This segmentation distributes the stress concentration points, preventing great plastic deformation at single central portions while maintaining effective impact force transmission to side sills and floor frames.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention introduces intermediate transmission members as mediators in the force transmission chain. These transmission members act as buffers that distribute and redirect impact forces, preventing direct stress concentration on the central portions of rear frames and support frame, thereby reducing plastic deformation while maintaining overall structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Force

If the support frame is connected to the front end portions of the rear frames, then the impact force is transmitted to the side sills, but the bottom walls of the front end portions are susceptible to deformation or bending due to stress concentration at weld joints

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact force transmissionVSAvoidstructural stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The invention introduces a first transmission member as an intermediary between the support frame and the front end portions of the rear frames. This intermediate member distributes the impact force away from the weld joints at the bottom walls, preventing stress concentration that would cause deformation or bending, while still enabling effective force transmission to the side sills.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If the rear frames have a step-like configuration at front end portions, then the support frame can be incorporated, but the rear frames are likely to deform or bend due to bucking at the step-like portions during rear-end collision

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupport frame integrationVSAvoidresistance to bucking
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The invention introduces a second transmission member as an intermediary that connects the support frame to the rear frames at locations that avoid the step-like portions. This intermediate member enables the support frame integration while bypassing the bucking-prone step-like configurations, preventing deformation or bending during rear-end collisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Ease of operation

If the rear frames support the upper ends of the struts, then the suspension units are supported, but the rear frames undergo undue elastic deformation when subjected to large upward thrust

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesuspension supportVSAvoidresistance to elastic deformation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The invention segments the load-bearing function by introducing transmission members that distribute the upward thrust from the suspension struts. Instead of concentrating all upward forces on the rear frames, the transmission members divide and redirect these forces through multiple paths, reducing undue elastic deformation while maintaining suspension support functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS7513329B2Vehicle rear body structure
Publication Date: 2009.04.07 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD
  • US7513329B2 patent drawing
  • US7513329B2 patent drawing
  • US7513329B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle rear body structure includes a support frame of generally rectangular shape attached to side frames of a vehicle body from below for supporting thereon a vehicle part including a fuel tank. The support frame is connected at a front end thereof to floor frames disposed inwardly of the side frames and extending along front parts of the side frames and, at a rear end thereof, to rear frames forming rear parts of the side frames.