Rear Automatic Braking System Driver Misuse Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Drivers often misuse rear automatic braking systems by relying solely on them to prevent collisions while reversing, rather than actively engaging the brakes themselves, which can lead to incomplete vehicle control.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a rearward-facing camera, processor, object detector, vehicle trajectory predictor, collision detector, driver intention monitor, and kinematic controller, which detects driver misuse by analyzing camera data, vehicle characteristics, and braking patterns to determine if the driver is relying excessively on the automatic braking system.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the automatic braking system is activated to prevent rear collisions, then collision avoidance capability is improved, but driver engagement and responsibility deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision avoidance capabilityVSAvoiddriver engagement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by monitoring driver braking behavior during reverse operations and providing alerts when misuse is detected. The processor analyzes the ratio of time the vehicle moves in reverse without brake application, and when this exceeds a threshold, it triggers a visual or audible alert to re-engage the driver, thus maintaining both collision avoidance and driver engagement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts its monitoring and alerting behavior based on detected driving patterns. It calculates the ratio of unbraked reverse movement time to total reverse time in real-time, and dynamically triggers alerts only when misuse patterns are detected, rather than operating in a static fixed mode.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Extent of automation

If the driver assistance system performs all stopping functions, then automation level is improved, but driver responsibility and control deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestopping function automationVSAvoiddriver responsibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides feedback to the driver about their braking behavior during reverse operations. By monitoring and analyzing brake application patterns, the system alerts drivers when they fail to apply brakes adequately, thereby maintaining driver responsibility while preserving the automated stopping assistance function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables drivers to self-correct their behavior by providing real-time feedback about misuse patterns. Drivers can adjust their braking behavior based on system alerts, promoting self-awareness and self-correction rather than complete reliance on automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If the system monitors driver behavior continuously, then misuse detection accuracy is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemisuse detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the critical monitoring function needed for misuse detection - specifically tracking brake pedal status and vehicle reverse movement time. Rather than monitoring all driver actions, it focuses on the essential parameters (brake application timing and duration during reverse), simplifying the monitoring system while maintaining detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses parameter changes by calculating the ratio of unbraked reverse time to total reverse time. This single ratio parameter effectively captures misuse patterns without requiring complex analysis of multiple independent variables, simplifying the detection algorithm while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10457145B1Method of determining and preventing a driver misuse in a rear automatic braking system
Publication Date: 2019.10.29 CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS INC
  • US10457145B1 patent drawing
  • US10457145B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Driver misuse of an automatic braking system is determined by comparing the amount of time that a vehicle moves rearwardly until it is stopped, to the amount of time after the last actuation of a brake pedal and when the vehicle is stopped. If the ratio of no brake applied time to the total reverse time is greater than a predetermined value, the automatic braking system is considered to have been misused. Each misuse occurrence increments a counter that is stored in a non-transitory memory device.