Rear Deploying Broadhead Impact Blade Deployment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional broadheads with fixed blades suffer from wind resistance and drag, leading to reduced accuracy and velocity, while blade-opening designs are often complex and prone to mechanical failures or premature opening, and annular retaining rings are brittle and difficult to install.

Innovation Solution

A rear-deploying broadhead with a piston or plunger mechanism within the body, where blades are retracted and retained by an external latex coating during flight, deploying upon impact to maximize cutting surface area and minimize wind resistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of moving object

If blades are exposed in a fixed position, then cutting surface area is increased, but wind resistance and drag increase reducing accuracy and velocity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting surface areaVSAvoidwind resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of moving objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The broadhead blades transition from a static fixed position to a dynamic configuration that changes during flight. The blades are held retracted during flight to minimize wind resistance, then deploy upon target impact to maximize cutting surface area. This dynamic adjustment resolves the contradiction between needing large cutting area and minimizing aerodynamic drag.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The blades are prepared in a retracted position before flight to minimize wind resistance during the approach. The deployment mechanism is pre-loaded with springs that will automatically activate the blade deployment upon impact, ensuring the blades are in the optimal position for each phase of the arrow's trajectory.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Area of moving object

If blade-opening designs are used to increase cutting surface area, then effectiveness is improved, but mechanical complexity increases leading to potential failures or premature opening

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting surface areaVSAvoidmechanical complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The deployment trigger mechanism is extracted from the broadhead body and replaced with a simple impact-activated system. Instead of complex mechanical triggers that could fail or activate prematurely, the design uses the impact force itself to compress the springs and deploy the blades, significantly reducing mechanical complexity while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The broadhead uses its own impact with the target to trigger blade deployment. The kinetic energy of the arrow automatically compresses the springs and releases the blades without requiring any additional sensing or control mechanisms. This self-activating system eliminates complex mechanical triggers and reduces the potential for failure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If annular retaining rings are used to hold blades, then blade retention is achieved, but installation difficulty and brittleness increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblade retentionVSAvoidinstallation ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The mechanical annular retaining ring system is replaced with a spring-based retention mechanism. The springs provide continuous radial force to hold the blades in the retracted position during flight, while allowing easy installation by simply positioning the blades and letting the springs engage. This eliminates the brittleness and installation difficulty associated with rigid retaining rings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enhances accuracy and velocity by reducing wind resistance and ensuring reliable blade deployment upon impact, maintaining effectiveness while simplifying installation and durability.

Implementation Method 1

The blades are retained in place by an external coating of latex or similar material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

The blades are retained in place by an external coating of latex or similar material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesion: Adhesive

Implementation Method 3

Upon impact with the quarry, the blades deploy through the external coating

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpact force: Impact Force

Data Source

PatentUS11725914B2Rear deploying broadhead
Publication Date: 2023.08.15 MOTZ TROY ALLEN
  • US11725914B2 patent drawing
  • US11725914B2 patent drawing
  • US11725914B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention is a rear-deploying broadhead with an outer housing, an inner spine, and at least two blades pivotally attached to the inner spine, with the inner spine having a first end with a plunger end, and a second end which is pointed. The outer housing has a first closed end that terminates proximal the body to an arrow shaft and a second end which is open. The inner spine is shorter than the outer housing and disposed in the center of the outer housing, with the plunger end seated inside the outer housing adjacent the first end of the outer housing. The two blades are configured to deploy through the open lateral sides of the outer housing upon movement of the inner spine toward the end of the outer housing. The broadhead has an coating of latex until the broadhead impacts a target, at which point the blades deploy through the coating.