Rear Discharge Mower Deck Asymmetric Blade Flow Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Rear discharge mower decks face challenges in evenly distributing grass clippings across the width due to unidirectional blade rotation, leading to windrowing and uneven cutting, and existing solutions with complex baffling structures are costly and affect cutting quality.

Innovation Solution

A rear discharge mower deck design featuring three rotary cutting blades with counter-rotating blades and strategically placed flow deflectors and a front flow control baffle to redirect clipping streams and air flows, ensuring even distribution without compromising cutting quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If unidirectional rotation of all cutting blades is used, then the structure is simple, but grass clippings are thrown out to the rear in a windrow along one side of the deck, creating uneven distribution and poor aesthetics

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclipping distribution uniformityVSAvoidblade rotation configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by configuring the cutting blades to rotate in opposite directions rather than all in the same direction. Specifically, the first and second cutting blades rotate in one direction while the third cutting blade rotates in the opposite direction, creating an asymmetric rotation pattern that distributes clippings more evenly across the rear discharge opening.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses inversion by reversing the rotation direction of one cutting blade relative to the others. Instead of all blades rotating in the same direction (conventional approach), the third blade rotates in the opposite direction, which inverts the clipping throw pattern and achieves more uniform distribution across the discharge opening.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Ease of operation

If complex baffling structure is added to create separate flow paths, then clipping distribution is improved, but manufacturing cost and maintenance cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclipping distribution uniformityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the operational parameter of blade rotation direction rather than adding complex structural elements. By modifying the rotation direction parameter of the cutting blades, the system achieves improved clipping distribution without the need for expensive baffling structures, thereby reducing manufacturing and maintenance costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the complex baffling structure from the design and replaces it with a simpler blade rotation configuration. By removing the unnecessary baffles and relying on the asymmetric blade rotation to achieve clipping distribution, the design reduces manufacturing complexity and maintenance requirements while maintaining or improving performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Ease of operation

If complex baffling structure is added to create separate flow paths, then clipping distribution is improved, but cutting quality deteriorates due to unevenly cut streaks appearing along the baffling lines

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclipping distribution uniformityVSAvoidcutting quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the operational parameter of blade rotation direction to achieve clipping distribution uniformity without introducing physical barriers that would interfere with the cutting process. This parameter change avoids the creation of unevenly cut streaks that would result from baffles interfering with grass flow into the blades.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent removes the baffling structure that causes cutting quality deterioration. By extracting these obstructive elements and relying solely on the asymmetric blade rotation configuration, the design eliminates the source of unevenly cut streaks while maintaining improved clipping distribution through the modified blade rotation pattern.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design achieves a more even distribution of grass clippings across the rear discharge opening, preventing windrowing and allowing for better decomposition into mulch while maintaining high cutting quality, with improved distribution and reduced streaking in the cut grass swath.

Implementation Method 1

one side surface of the deflector intercepts a first air flow and grass clipping stream generated by one blade to redirect the first air flow and grass clipping stream upwardly within the space and the other side surface of the deflector intercepts a second air flow and grass clipping stream generated by the other counter-rotating blade to also redirect the second air flow and grass clipping stream upwardly with the space

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid flow redirection:

Data Source

PatentUS10306835B2Rear discharge mower deck
Publication Date: 2019.06.04 EXMARK MFG CO INC
  • US10306835B2 patent drawing
  • US10306835B2 patent drawing
  • US10306835B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A rotary mower cutting deck has a downwardly opening space and rear discharge opening. A center blade and a first side blade rotating in one direction and a second counter-rotating side blade are within the space. A front flow control baffle has a first V-shaped apex located between the unidirectional blades and a second V-shaped apex between the center blade and the counter-rotating side blade. A first V-shaped flow deflector mounted to the first apex points downwardly to cause many grass clippings from the first side blade to be directed to the rear discharge opening without passing to the center blade. A second V-shaped flow deflector mounted to the second apex points upwardly to disrupt the convergence of the air flows and clipping streams from the center and second side blades to maintain the quality of cut and reduce blow out.