Vehicle Rear Frame Asymmetric Thickness Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing vehicle rear body structure may cause the rear frame to bend and potentially contact critical components like the gasoline tank and IPU during impact, limiting deformation and increasing the risk of damage.

Innovation Solution

The vehicle rear body structure features rear frames with a lower half part thicker than the upper half, incorporating first, second, and third soft zones arranged sequentially, with the second soft zone formed in a ring shape to allow vertical bending and prevent contact with critical components, while allowing for deformation to absorb impact loads.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the rear frame is designed with uniform thickness for impact absorption, then the deformation capacity is improved, but the weight increases and structural strength is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverear frame deformation capacityVSAvoidrear frame weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The rear frame is designed with non-uniform thickness distribution, featuring a thicker lower half part and thinner upper half part. This local quality variation allows the frame to have enhanced deformation capacity in the lower region for impact absorption while maintaining overall structural strength and reducing unnecessary weight in the upper region.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Loss of energy

If the rear frame is allowed to deform horizontally to absorb impact, then the impact absorption capacity is improved, but the risk of contact with critical components like gasoline tank and IPU increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact energy absorptionVSAvoidcontact damage to critical components
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of allowing horizontal deformation of the rear frame, the invention inverts the deformation direction by guiding it vertically through the asymmetric thickness design. The thicker lower half part acts as a hinge that enables vertical bending, redirecting the impact energy absorption mechanism from horizontal to vertical motion, thereby avoiding contact with horizontally positioned critical components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the dimension of deformation from horizontal to vertical by introducing asymmetric thickness distribution. The rear frame's lower half part, being thicker, serves as a pivot point that transforms the deformation pathway into the vertical dimension, allowing impact energy absorption without compromising the horizontal clearance to critical components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Weight of moving object

If the rear frame is designed with asymmetric thickness (thicker lower half), then the weight is reduced and vertical deformation is enabled, but the manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverear frame weightVSAvoidrear frame manufacturing
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The asymmetric thickness design is implemented as a localized feature in the lower half part of the rear frame, rather than a complete redesign of the entire structure. This approach allows standard manufacturing processes to be used with minimal modifications, reducing the impact on manufacturing complexity while achieving weight reduction and functional benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design effectively inhibits contact with the gasoline tank and IPU, reserves deformation for impact absorption, and reduces weight by allowing different thickness dimensions in the rear frame, enhancing the vehicle's ability to absorb impact loads.

Implementation Method 1

the second soft zone can be stably bent downward about the upper half part of the second soft zone so as to be folded into a valley fold

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlastic deformation: Plasticity

Implementation Method 2

the first soft zone can be bent upward about the lower half part of the first soft zone so as to be folded into a mountain fold, and likewise the third soft zone can be bent upward about the lower half part of the third soft zone so as to be folded into a mountain fold

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlastic deformation: Plasticity

Data Source

PatentUS10207740B2Vehicle rear body structure
Publication Date: 2019.02.19 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD
  • US10207740B2 patent drawing
  • US10207740B2 patent drawing
  • US10207740B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle rear body structure 10 includes a left rear frame 13 that is formed to have a closed section. The left rear frame 13 has a lower member 22 that is formed to have a thickness dimension larger than an upper member 23 thereof. The left rear frame 13 has a first soft zone 24, a second soft zone 25, and a third soft zone 26. The first to third soft zones 24, 25, and 26 are portions with lower strength. The second soft zone 25 is provided in a ring shape throughout the circumference of the left rear frame 13. The first soft zone 24 and the third soft zone 26 are arranged in a lower half part of the left rear frame 13.