Rear Split Seat Collision Locking for Seatback Rigidity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional rear split seats in vehicles suffer from weak rigidity at the interface between the left and right seats, leading to potential deformation during collisions, which can result in passenger injury and damage to seatbelt anchors.

Innovation Solution

A collision locking device is introduced, featuring a striker structure on one seatback and a locking device on the other, which couples the seatbacks together via a locking operation triggered by inertial force during a collision, preventing deformation and maintaining the seats' original position.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the left seat and right seat are connected only by a center hinge assembly, then the seat structure remains simple and easy to manufacture, but the rigidity of the interface between seats is weak

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverigidity of interface between seatsVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking device is activated in advance by inertial force generated during collision to couple the seatbacks together before deformation occurs, preventing harmful effects rather than correcting them after the fact

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

A striker structure is introduced as an intermediary component that mediates the coupling between left and right seatbacks during collision, enabling the locking mechanism to engage effectively

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the seatbacks are not coupled during collision, then the device complexity remains low, but the seatbacks deform easily under impact force

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance to deformation during collisionVSAvoidlocking mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking device utilizes the inertial force generated during collision itself to activate the locking mechanism, making the system self-activating without requiring external sensors or control systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The inertial force generated during collision, which would otherwise cause deformation and injury, is converted into a beneficial force that activates the locking mechanism to couple the seatbacks together

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Reliability

If the seatbelt anchor is mounted on the seatback, then the seatbelt function is integrated, but the anchor is damaged when the seatback deforms during collision

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseatbelt anchor integrity during collisionVSAvoiddamage to seatbelt anchor
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The locking device performs preliminary action by coupling the seatbacks together before the collision impact can cause deformation, thereby preventing damage to the seatbelt anchor and other components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device effectively prevents seatback deformation and reduces passenger injury by coupling the seatbacks together, thereby safeguarding passengers and preventing seatbelt anchor damage during collisions.

Implementation Method 1

a locking device mounted on the seatback of the left seat or the seatback of the right seat and operated so as to be locked and coupled to the striker structure by inertial force resulting from vehicle collision

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInertial force: Inertia

Data Source

PatentUS20240262267A1Collision locking device for rear split seat of vehicle
Publication Date: 2024.08.08 HYUNDAI TRANSYS INC
  • US20240262267A1 patent drawing
  • US20240262267A1 patent drawing
  • US20240262267A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a collision locking device for a rear split seat of a vehicle, the collision locking device including a striker structure mounted on a seatback of a left seat of the rear split seat or a seatback of a right seat thereof and a locking device mounted on the seatback of the left seat of the rear split seat or the seatback of the right seat thereof, wherein the seatback of the left seat and the seatback of the right seat are coupled to each other by a locking operation of the locking device configured to be locked and coupled to the striker structure in the event of impact occurrence due to vehicle collision, thereby preventing the seatback of the left seat or the seatback of the right seat from being deformed form the original position thereof.