Two-Piece Rear Sprocket Assembly With Latching Load Distribution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing bicycle rear wheel sprocket assemblies experience mechanical stress and potential damage due to large differences in sprocket sizes, leading to stress peaks and cracking, particularly at the fastening surfaces where oversized pins are used for attachment, causing axial deformation and form-fitting effects that are not sufficient to handle operational forces effectively.

Innovation Solution

The introduction of elastically deformable latching formations on the subassemblies that secure the two subassemblies together through a form-fitting engagement, eliminating the need for separate fasteners and enhancing component strength by distributing forces more evenly, while maintaining assembly simplicity and reducing assembly effort.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If oversized pins are used for attachment at fastening surfaces, then the connection between subassemblies is secured, but stress peaks and cracking occur due to insufficient distribution of operational forces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection strengthVSAvoidfastening surface reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The pinion assembly is divided into two separate subassemblies (first subassembly with largest pinion, second subassembly with remaining pinions) that are connected through interlocking formations rather than traditional fasteners. This segmentation allows forces to be distributed across multiple engagement points (locking formations and counter-formations) rather than concentrating stress at single fastening holes, thereby preventing cracking while maintaining connection strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The connection interface features localized interlocking formations with specific geometric shapes designed to distribute loads evenly across the engagement surfaces. The locking formations include features such as protrusions, recesses, and bearing surfaces that are strategically positioned to handle different force components (axial, radial, tangential), creating locally optimized stress distribution zones that prevent stress peaks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of manufacture

If traditional fastening pins are used, then assembly is simplified, but mechanical strength is reduced due to weakening of fastening surfaces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly simplicityVSAvoidfastening surface strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The fastening function and the structural connection function are merged into a single integrated interlocking mechanism. The locking formations are formed as integral parts of the subassemblies themselves, eliminating the need for separate fasteners. This merging maintains assembly simplicity while significantly improving strength by distributing loads across the interlocking geometry rather than relying on weakened fastening holes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The traditional fastening holes and separate fastener components are extracted from the design. Instead of creating holes that weaken the fastening surfaces, the connection is achieved through protruding locking formations that engage with corresponding counter-formations, removing the source of stress concentration while maintaining ease of assembly through the inherent geometry of the interlocking features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Strength

If separate fastening components are used, then connection is achieved, but device complexity increases and assembly effort increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection strengthVSAvoidassembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The subassemblies are designed with self-locking interlocking formations that automatically engage and secure the connection during the assembly process. The locking formations are shaped such that when the subassemblies are brought together, the features naturally mate and lock without requiring additional fastening operations, tools, or complex sequencing, thereby reducing both device complexity and assembly effort while maintaining strong connections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution significantly increases the mechanical strength and stability of the pinion arrangement, preventing relative movement between subassemblies and ensuring a secure, practically unreleasable latching engagement that enhances operational reliability and reduces the risk of damage from operational forces.

Implementation Method 1

at least one of the first and second sub-assemblies has elastically deformable latching formations which are in latching engagement with latching counter-formations of the other sub-assemblies

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP3831703B1Rear wheel pinion assembly with two pieces for joint rotation of partial assemblies connected to each other
Publication Date: 2023.01.25 SRAM
  • EP3831703B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3831703B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3831703B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A bicycle rear wheel sprocket assembly (30), rotatable about a common sprocket rotation axis (RA) defining an axial direction and radial directions orthogonal thereto, comprises a plurality of sprockets (R1-R12) of different sizes and numbers of teeth arranged coaxially with respect to the sprocket rotation axis (RA) and connected to one another for common rotation about the sprocket rotation axis (RA). The sprocket assembly (30) has a first sub-assembly (32) comprising the largest sprocket (R1), and a second sub-assembly (34) comprising a plurality of sprockets (R3-R12) formed integrally together. According to the invention, the second sub-assembly (34) has a series of between 6 and 12 axially successive sprockets (R3-R12) formed integrally together.