Convertible Rear Window Control for Aerodynamics and Isolation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing convertible motor vehicles face challenges in improving aerodynamics and comfort, particularly in a reliable and reproducible manner, especially when the rear windows are lowered to enhance aerodynamics with the roof open.

Innovation Solution

A motor vehicle with a movable roof and rear windows that automatically adjust between closed and open positions based on the roof configuration, using an actuator assembly and control unit to ensure isolation and visibility, while optimizing aerodynamics and comfort.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If the rear windows are lowered manually to enhance aerodynamics with the roof open, then aerodynamic performance is improved, but manual operation complexity increases and automation is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaerodynamic performanceVSAvoidmanual operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The rear windows automatically detect the roof position and adjust their own position accordingly. When the roof is open, the windows lower themselves to enhance aerodynamics; when the roof is closed, they raise themselves to maintain visibility and isolation. This self-service mechanism eliminates manual operation while optimizing aerodynamic performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The control system is configured to automatically lower the rear windows before or during the roof opening process, and raise them before or during the roof closing process. This preliminary action ensures optimal aerodynamic performance is achieved proactively without requiring manual intervention after the roof position changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Loss of energy

If the rear windows are lowered to create air flow outlets with the roof open, then aerodynamics is improved, but rear visibility and compartment isolation are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaerodynamic efficiencyVSAvoidrear visibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The rear windows are designed with dynamic positioning capability, automatically adjusting between lowered and raised positions based on roof configuration. When the roof is open, windows lower to improve aerodynamics; when the roof is closed, windows raise to maintain rear visibility and compartment isolation. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction between aerodynamic efficiency and visibility requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the position parameter of the rear windows based on the roof state parameter. By detecting whether the roof is open or closed, the control unit adjusts the window position parameter accordingly, optimizing aerodynamic efficiency when the roof is open while maintaining visibility and isolation when the roof is closed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of energy

If automatic control systems are implemented to coordinate roof and window positions, then aerodynamic performance and comfort are optimized, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaerodynamic performanceVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit is designed to perform multiple functions: detecting roof position, controlling rear window positioning, and coordinating with the actuator assembly. This multi-functional approach consolidates control logic into a single device, reducing overall system complexity while achieving optimized aerodynamic performance and passenger comfort through automatic coordination of roof and window positions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If the rear windows remain in fixed closed positions with the roof open, then compartment isolation is maintained, but aerodynamic performance and passenger comfort deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompartment isolationVSAvoidaerodynamic performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The rear windows transition from a fixed position to a dynamic position system that automatically adjusts based on roof configuration. When the roof is open, the windows lower to improve aerodynamics and passenger comfort; when the roof is closed, they raise to maintain compartment isolation. This dynamic behavior resolves the contradiction between maintaining isolation and optimizing aerodynamic performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12403751B2Motor vehicle including controllable rear window and roof
Publication Date: 2025.09.02 FERRARI SPA
  • US12403751B2 patent drawing
  • US12403751B2 patent drawing
  • US12403751B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A motor vehicle includes a frame with a first and a second opening, which are oriented transversely to the forward moving direction; a first rear window, which is coupled to the frame in a movable manner between a first position, in which it closes the first opening, and a second position, in which it at least partially frees the first opening; a second rear window, which is coupled to the frame in a movable manner between a third position, in which it closes the second opening, and a fourth position, in which it partially frees the second opening; a roof, which is coupled to the frame in a movable manner between a closed and an open configuration; first driving means, which are configured to automatically place the first and the second rear window in the first and in the second position, respectively, when the roof is in the closed configuration and/or to place the first and the second rear window in the third and in the fourth position, respectively, when the roof is in the open configuration.