Reasoning Graph Transliteration via Templating Libraries

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The manual coding or use of custom software for translating reasoning graphs between programming languages is costly and time-consuming, hindering efficient translation and insight determination.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for automatically transliterating reasoning graphs using a transliteration library that correlates reasoning functions with templating functions, generating a templating language representation, and converting it into high-level programming or documentation language, ultimately producing machine executable code.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual coding or custom software is used for translating reasoning graphs between programming languages, then translation accuracy can be maintained, but translation time and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetranslation accuracyVSAvoidtranslation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables reasoning graphs to translate themselves automatically through the transliteration library that correlates reasoning functions with templating functions, eliminating the need for manual coding while maintaining accuracy through structured correspondence rules

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical coding processes with an automated computational system that uses transliteration libraries and compilers to convert reasoning graphs between programming languages, significantly reducing translation time while preserving accuracy through systematic translation rules

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If manual coding is used for translating reasoning graphs, then translation precision can be controlled, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetranslation precisionVSAvoidtranslation productivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The transliteration library enables automatic self-translation of reasoning graphs by correlating reasoning functions with templating functions, maintaining precision through structured correspondence while dramatically improving productivity through automation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the state of reasoning graphs from manual code to templated representations that can be automatically processed through compilers, transforming the translation process from low-productivity manual coding to high-productivity automated processing while preserving precision through controlled translation parameters

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Speed

If automated transliteration is implemented, then translation speed increases, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetranslation speedVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the translation system into distinct components: reasoning graphs, transliteration libraries with templating functions, and compilers. This modular segmentation enables automated high-speed translation while managing complexity through separate, well-defined modules rather than a monolithic system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The transliteration library acts as an intermediary between reasoning graphs and target programming languages, providing standardized templating functions that simplify the translation process. This intermediary layer manages complexity by abstracting the translation logic while enabling fast automated conversion

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If custom software translators are used, then translation reliability can be maintained, but development cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetranslation reliabilityVSAvoiddevelopment cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system eliminates the need for expensive custom software development by enabling reasoning graphs to translate themselves through automated transliteration libraries, reducing development costs while maintaining reliability through systematic translation correspondence rules

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses templating functions that copy and adapt reasoning graph structures to target programming languages, providing reliable translation through reusable templates rather than custom-coded translators, significantly reducing development costs while maintaining translation reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS12061886B2Automatically generating reasoning graphs
Publication Date: 2024.08.13 COTIVITI INC
  • US12061886B2 patent drawing
  • US12061886B2 patent drawing
  • US12061886B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments disclosed herein relate to methods and systems for transliterating reasoning graphs and using the same to determine insights.