Rebar Binding Hook Locking to Cut Reactive Force and Motor Load

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing reinforcing bar binding machines face a significant reactive force when locking wires between hooks, leading to increased load on the motor and inefficiency in the binding process.

Innovation Solution

A binding machine with a locking member comprising a first and second hook, where the hooks can move to lock and unlock the wire, reducing the reactive force by allowing controlled movement to prevent wire disengagement, thereby reducing the load on the motor.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the hooks press the wire firmly to lock it securely, then the reliability of wire locking is improved, but the reactive force increases and motor load increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewire locking reliabilityVSAvoidreactive force
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The locking member is designed with movable hooks that can dynamically adjust their position. The first hook moves toward the second hook during locking operation, and the hooks can move away from each other during unlocking. This dynamic movement allows the system to maintain reliable wire locking while reducing reactive force by avoiding continuous rigid pressing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the physical state of the locking member from static to movable. By enabling the hooks to change their relative position (moving toward each other for locking, moving away for unlocking), the system optimizes the balance between locking reliability and reactive force reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If the hooks move toward each other to lock the wire, then the wire locking reliability is improved, but the motor load increases due to reactive force

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewire locking reliabilityVSAvoidmotor load
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The locking member incorporates movable hooks that change position during operation. The first hook moves toward the second hook to achieve reliable locking, and can move away during unlocking. This dynamic design allows the motor to operate only during position changes rather than continuously overcoming reactive force, reducing overall motor load.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Power

If the hooks are made movable to reduce reactive force, then the motor load is reduced, but the complexity of the locking member increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotor loadVSAvoidlocking member complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking member is designed with simple movable hooks that can move toward and away from each other. This dynamic structure achieves motor load reduction while maintaining relatively simple construction, as the movability is integrated into the basic hook design rather than requiring complex additional mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11931871B2Binding machine
Publication Date: 2024.03.19 MAX CO LTD
  • US11931871B2 patent drawing
  • US11931871B2 patent drawing
  • US11931871B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A binding machine includes a wire feeding unit, a curl forming unit, a cutting unit, and a binding unit. The binding unit includes a locking member that includes a first hook and a second hook and that locks the wire by moving the first hook toward the second hook. The locking member includes a locking part that locks the wire in a state in which the first hook has been moved toward the second hook, and an unlocking part that makes it possible for the first hook to be movable away from the second hook with such an amount of movement that the locked wire does not come off between the first hook and the second hook.